That seems like 17 strikes too many.
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
227 points (98.3% liked)
Not The Onion
18680 readers
664 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Zero strikes and you're out!
I suggest a 1 strike policy.
Here's an example: use 1 supersonic heatseeking rocket to do a rocket strike on Zuckerberg (if he survives then use 1 more rocket until he is no longer breathing)
If successful then it could be a policy that's adopted to be used on other billionaires, muskyboy, tRUMP, etc etc.
It may not work but I say we should give it a go for about ten years to see what happens...
meanwhile YouTube had a 3 strike policy for copyright claims that might not even be true
Ah, but corporate profit margins are much more important than people
Ha ha ha ha........ha..........
cries
Jesus fuck, even 3-strikes would be absurd for this...
17 is an oddly specific number.
I have to believe Jerry, the exec who's bad at his job but the CEO likes him, has 16 strikes. One more strike, and the CEO will be forced to update the policy again.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on you. Fool me three times, shame on you. Fool me four times...
I'm not defending the policy but the title doesn't match the story:
“That means that you could incur 16 violations for prostitution and sexual solicitation, and upon the 17th violation, your account would be suspended,”
Wait but that changes everything? Sex work doesn't automatically mean sex trafficking??
Yeah, to me it's muddy waters. While some people look down on it, if an adult posts something that says free Saturday night, hit me up for a price... That's not anywhere near trafficking. But it is very much solicitation.
Yeah, but the title says only sex trafficking
It appears that the article and possibly the site is just ragebait bs.
So, 17 strikes you're out.
Thats why baseball games in the 1800s were much longer.
You should look into the history of cricket
I mean, it IS The Verge. They could be so inept that they just forgot to include anything relating to the title in their story
that matches the title completely
Sex work =/= sex trafficking
Unless they have to drive to you during rush hour. Then it's sex work with traffic.
Meta allegedly gave accounts engaged in the “trafficking of humans for sex” 16 chances before suspending them,
the article is about sex trafficking, the policy would also apply to sex workers, eventually.
not everything about sex trafficking is about sex workers…
Sometimes. Probably not on Facebook.
There's a pretty good This American Life about it. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/740/there-i-fixed-it
What's "This american life", beyond a podcast? Not something I'm familiar with.
Meanwhile, one harmless meme and you're suspended. I don't get why people use Meta anymore. The site went to shit 20 years ago, and nobody seems to want to jump to another platform. For reasons unknown - there was no issue leaving MySpace for Facebook, so just fucking do it again.
Idk the only time I've seen Facebook dot com links is when my parents send me AI videos of animals. I'm trying to get them off of it but they are set in their ways, etc etc
/community
What the fuck