LifeInMultipleChoice

joined 2 years ago
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Or else what? They are still fired? Strange way to manage anything

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Not always the greatest fun. I got "pulled over" walking home one time. I was cutting through a plaza as my complex was behind it. Thankfully in Florida it isn't illegal to be drunk in public, it's only illegal to be disorderly or a threat to yourself/others. Which makes sense to me, if you don't have an open container and aren't yelling at strangers, walking home is the best option many times. That said it was also ruled years ago in Florida that having a bag of mushrooms in your pocket isn't illegal. As the courts rules the standard person cannot discern whether or not a mushroom is psychosomatic.. Thus people should be able to walk around with foraged or store bought mushrooms as it's their freedom to enjoy them.

Of course that's what they are. Otherwise they would have been on U.S. soil

So Trump starts mining company for Bitcoin as they announced. Then once they have a decent amount they start investing all the gold from Fort Knox into Bitcoin as previously stated by the white House to inflate prices. Then uses the money for illegal bribes with anonymous accounts? Something like that I assume

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Oh I'm sure they aren't great people. They make most of their money off swindling insurance companies for huge settlement offers due to work/car injuries. That said, if you're trying to get a huge settlement from Walmart, they are probably a good bet though. Also I know they turned down a case years ago when my dad went to them about his mother. She had surgery where there was no cartilage left in her ankle. They decided to screw her ankle to her foot essentially making it unable to move but reduce the pain. When she was in recovery they kept forcing her to get up and walk on it and she kept saying it hurt to much. Weeks into the rehab they said she wasn't trying to put in the work. Then after a lot of arguing we finally got them to do new X-rays. Of course they found hairline fractures around the screws they placed. The insurance company/Medicaid and what not all said they wouldn't cover any rehab time after the fractures were found because that time was used up during the period they were trying to force her to walk on a botched surgery. Morgan and Morgan turned down the case, and she reverse mortgaged her house to cover the rehab time. America at its finest

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Morgan and Morgan is from Florida, they might be the largest firm in the world and take cases for improper firings. Usually they take their cases on the basis of you won't pay anything unless you win. I'm sure they'd love that case

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 134 points 4 days ago (6 children)

It's a constant shame on the empire now

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (3 children)

If it actually worked it's a funny way to say, let's tax corporations. It would never happen though because it makes line go down.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

So are you going to make a bad faith argument that Microsoft, Google, Apple, Sony, Nintendo, Steam or who is a good company to buy platforms or games from? Note, most games brought to Linux happen because much of it was funded from sales off those platforms as well. So in todays world if you want Linux games, you have to hope people keep buying them on those major platforms.

Or are you just going to take the low road of describing yourself as better than everyone else because you only play niche unprofitable games that most people will never hear of and therefor most of society who doesnt have large amounts of time to invest in games likely won't ever see.

I hope you are right. This timeline usually shows the companies caving, keeping a bit of a difference from directive, selling it as a we won't change to their people and actually giving ground to the bullies so they can claim they won as well on conservative media. The polarization of the population makes it so their media won't overlap enough to cause real conflict, just enough to say the other "side" of the conflict is nuts ignore them.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

My first thought was it being an incorrect first line and my brain went "and I'm getting stoned."

"She got a rock,

And I'm gettin' stoned"

But then had that very programmed feeling of you shouldn't say that because you aren't getting stoned and you don't want people to think of you as getting up and getting stoned on a Saturday morning. Talk about being programmed to fear what other people think.

Anyways Eric Church has a couple songs I liked

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Whoever killed that Deathcare CEO had a positive impact, then billionaires spent a lot of time and money to try to turn the narrative. Note there were a lot of conservatives that werent against it until they watched a week and a half of propaganda to find out what they believed again. I think it showed a few people that the healthcare system is flawed, and clearly the justice system is. Was it 300 million, no. Was it 3 million, maybe. Even if 1% learned something from it, I'd say that's huge for a population this late in the capitalism game

 

Recent games: 2016...

 

"But tires"

Ban all vehicles over 5000lbs to start without a specialized license and extremely heavy fees to have them. EVs are dropping in weight daily, ICE vehicles have been increasing in weight to dodge policies. One is a means to an end, the other is a means to profit.

Profit for few vs humanity's existance.. which should we choose?

 

The article seems to be shittily written in my opinion but I figure if you watch the video (about a minute) it will get the point across.

My question lies in, do you think this will benefit the health of the people moving forward, or do you fear it being weaponized to endorse or threaten companies to comply with the mention of Kennedy being tied to its future as mentioned in the end of the article

view more: next ›