this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
198 points (99.0% liked)

Opensource

4531 readers
143 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 7 points 15 hours ago

We need to stop using HDMI, we must force screen makers to switch to DisplayPort.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Beuh, fuck the HDMI forum. I hope the spec is leaked and somebody just makes a kernel module which implements it.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I realize this is probably a solved problem for Windows pirates, but how do you trust the kernel if it's not from a legal reputable source?

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 6 hours ago

What makes a legal source reputable? Do you think Microsoft is "reputable"?

[–] nukeforyou@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why even bother with HDMI??

ooh I love to pay royalties to and get permission to use the technology and the trademark. /s

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 46 points 1 day ago

Because love it or hate it, HDMI is the main interface that the vast majority of TVs use.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Find me a TV that's both designed for gaming and has a DisplayPort. Hell, find me any consumer TV with the port. Remember that the Steam Machine is intended for the living room big screen, not a 27" gaming monitor.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B015OW3GJK

There's always this option, could even include something like it in the box.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

That's a passive cable and would require DP++. Funnily enough it would also require a HDMI 2.1 capable driver.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 1 points 19 hours ago

That probably won't work. It will get basic video and maybe audio through, but not features like VRR, which is why you'd care about HDMI 2.1 support at all

[–] refalo@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Um, I said TV, and all three of these are monitors. Niche monitors at that too, none of them are even in stock.

Furthermore, how many console gamers do you know who have a 55" Alienware monitor in their living room? I did say consumer TV as well, ya know.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What is your definition of TV in this context? All of these are 55"+, some even show pictures of it in a living room...

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Look: It doesn't matter what you think is and isn't a TV, the fact of the matter is that the target market doesn't have one of these and doesn't care. They've got their $300 65" Hisense from Walmart, and guess what? Those TVs don't have DisplayPort. That's the point.

Now please stop being a pedantic jerk just for the sake of a it and go away.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago

Aren't you literally being pedantic on the definition? They're both displays in the 55 inch range that can display media and are made for consumers.

You're the one who keeps moving the goalposts.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 31 points 1 day ago

For this specific device you want to be able to hook it up to a TV, and unfortunately TVs tend to come with HDMI, not the superior displayport.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It will be replaced by GDMI which the Chinese invented in the future anyway.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Did they also invent time travel?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

They will invented it

That's coming in V2

[–] saphiron@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What kind of cancer is this website? Some fukcing "pur" subscription required.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 4 points 19 hours ago

Ublock has a feature to disable javascript by default. There's no better way to use the internet in 2025

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

It's "pay or OK", the "pur" subscription isn't needed for viewing the content. They'll probably gonna stick to that until the highest court has finally ruled that "pay or OK" is not OK at all.