this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
6 points (68.8% liked)

politics

22801 readers
3063 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We might have to confront that the distress over the incuriosity and maliciousness of our so-called best and brightest is little more than a sideshow, as is the question of which encryption apps they do or don’t use on their phones. We might have to reckon with the fact that our present moment is a grotesque but legible fulfillment of four years of pretending that Joe Biden was sharper and more in charge than ever. We might have to consider that partisans have spent at least two decades-plus pretending that his predecessors were each, in their own turn, figures who by virtue of their individual personality and will would and could change everything. The new boss will be entirely different from the old boss, and whether that means he will fix what the previous one broke and or finish what the other started, now—finally—legitimacy, presidentiality, and even America itself will be great because it’s good. One more effort, one more president, and what has been smashed will be put right. We might have to acknowledge how, differences in rhetoric and variations in policy in other domains notwithstanding, the United States has spent a quarter century—at the least—doubling down on the centralization of lethal power in the executive branch alongside granting ever greater legal license, funding, and deference to the military and security apparatus. And we might have to confront not just that last week’s biggest story isn’t much of a story at all, but that the only thing holding our empire together is the collective fantasy that somebody, anybody is dynamic, cogent, and, above all, in charge enough to lead and make sense of the machine. But some things, it seems, must remain taboo.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago

I really appreciated this article and absolutely think it's worth a few minutes of your time.