this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
270 points (99.6% liked)

News

33702 readers
3342 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rainbowbunny@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

He also claimed the US was there 300 years ago. "We were there with boats too I'm sure." (Refrencing Greenland) Piped Reuters

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

My conspiracy theory with this Greenland thing: Those in power now are deliberately destroying the world so it can be "rebuilt the right way". Greenland is in a position on the globe to become quite a pleasant climate. Once the ice melts it will be one of the best places on earth to live. Not to mention the huge amount of natural resources that will become available. Its also currently a politically isolated area, so when WW3 wipes out half the population it will most likely remain untouched. (Though tbf if trump makes moves on it that wont be the case). I don't think the current admin is even really aware of why Greenland is important, save for a few people who implemented project 2025.
removes foil hat

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 hours ago

to add: when the polar ice caps melt it will be positioned directly in a newly available shipping route

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago

As an anti-war person, I will fight for Greenland’s autonomy.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The USA is the most secure nation on the planet, we don't need shit

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

We'll just ignore all those war thunder forum leaks.

[–] gressen@lemmy.zip 22 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is an attack of whole EU.

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 40 points 13 hours ago (13 children)

Oil,that's what he means by national security. Dear Americans please get rid of that cancer you call potus. General strikes is what you can do.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They'll just find another great american to replace him

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Ah, more attempts to distract from the Epstein Files it seems

Man has no actual intention to do anything to Greenland.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Stop downplaying his direct threats on another nation's sovereignty. He has the motive and the means to do it. It's a very real threat and ignoring it is dangerous.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

I seem to remember dems downplaying the danger of trump running for president and look how that went...

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Please stop doing his PR for him. Is it just like he didn't really have an actual intention to deploy ICE as blackshirts? Is it like how he wasn't really going to gut government agencies under the flimsiest excuse of "DOGE"? Is it like how he wasn't going to go completely absurd with tariffs? Is it just like he wasn't going to begin sinking ships, pirating oil tankers, and starting wars with nearby countries?

Just because the guy is so incompetent his letting you see his cards before he has played them doesn't mean he does not intend on playing them. It is signalling to Russia, China, and Saudi Arabia not only that he has them but that he will play them. This all comes from initiatives from people like the Heritage Foundation's Luke Coffey colliding and merging with all the other agendas he sees himself benefiting from that have foreign powers freely buying his influence and pushing him towards this change in world order.

When China invades Taiwan, when Russia begins invading other countries besides Ukraine, it is very likely the Trump administration will use this as an excuse to try to "protect" strategic interests like Canada and Greenland, which will just be the US moving in their military influence into the bases already present on their soil and then sprawling out to whatever "strategic" assets they need to "secure", while also trying to pressure their governments into a deal like Ukraine's. When they don't cooperate, they will call up on their new "allies" to manufacture pressure for them while they are preoccupied trying to keep the US military locked down, likely through "Trump daddy" Mark Rutte led NATO.

No amount of denial has ever kept wars from happening in the past.

[–] paperazzi@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Canada understands the threat, thus the boycott of all things USian and call for 300,000 civilian military.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

USian

Nobody uses this. In fact nobody uses an acronym and slaps ian or any other postfix to describe any group of people anywhere UAEians see how weird that is?

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

They're called Emerati which is not far off from UAEian.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

Shit, good point, he's done other crazy shit.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 11 points 8 hours ago

I wouldn't be so certain. He's weird. And someone is probably telling him he could name it Trumpland.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

What is his obsession with that place?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 hours ago

Oil probably

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 8 points 8 hours ago
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

"That's what she said, and I still fucked her" - Pedo Trump

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 9 points 11 hours ago

"That's not what my dad taught me"

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

Threatening to annex a country to coerce them into giving away mineral rights

Art of the Deeeaaalllllll

scumbag

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 46 points 16 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Take this seriously. The rest of the world does. We should too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Tiel has been pushing chat control on europe and Denmark is the forefront of making it happen. Is the greenland and chat control situation connected? Sure seems like the perfect timing. Threaten to take greenland unless pushing through laws that are universally hated by the people (which makes absolutely no sense in europe because the government and the people are supposed to be one and the same and where we generally only let insane laws pass when the US threatens sanctions which is technically not even possible on a single european country as the union is a trade union lol - but soft power, i guess).

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 11 hours ago

*Thiel.

No, I don't think it's connected, beyond the obvious: MAGA having a boner for both Greenland and the EU. Greenland has Oil btw. And will become ever more important geopolitically as the ice keeps on melting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tehsillz@lemmy.world 22 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

This is not just Trump at this point. No American is standing up for their ally Denmark. This is disgusting and involves all Americans. Stop buying their shitty weapons.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 8 points 9 hours ago

Stop buying all their products.

You wouldn't buy a can of beans grown and packed by the Nazis, or firewall security software from Russia. I actively stopped buying any American products in the store when I Trump won both times.

Fuck tyrants.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 6 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

No American is standing up for their ally Denmark. This is disgusting and involves all Americans.

What? This very much does not involve all Americans.

Most Americans despise this asshole and have no interest in invading Greenland, and plenty see it as a horrific betrayal.

[–] tehsillz@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Show me one American politician who is standing up for Denmark and Greenland right now

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

TBF most Americans couldn't find Denmark.

[–] tehsillz@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Real shame considering Denmark spend 19 years with the US in Afghanistan and lost 44 soldiers..

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

Please, don't you know history? America liberated Afghanistan all on its own and and never even came close to losing that war

/S

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 11 hours ago

IMHO saying "this involves all Americans" is valid, and not an attack against every single one.

load more comments
view more: next ›