this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
273 points (99.6% liked)

Canada

9702 readers
720 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I read that completely differently from how it was meant.

They're pushing out fossil fuel furnaces.

[–] Kelsenellenelvial@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Been a little while since I looked up the utility rates, but last I remember gas is about 1/7 the cost of electricity in Saskatchewan. Makes it hard to justify heat pumps for heating in most places. Hope the technology continues to improve and it’ll be a more sustainable option when we have a more sustainable grid.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 9 points 9 hours ago

Gas furnaces achieve about 96-98% efficiency. Heat pumps achieve 300-400%. So you have to factor that in.

There's still a cost difference but the hope is for governments to start supporting serious nuclear energy to drive down electric costs. It'll take time but natural gas will become less economical as decades go on especially with investments.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

I'm in Manitoba and am kind of in the same situation. Even though our electricity is really cheap, it's still more economically efficient to use natural gas. Coupled with just buying a new furnace and air conditioner, I don't see myself getting one anytime soon. I'd still be happier if we subsidized electric heating/heat pumps (or stopped subsidizing fossil fuels so much) but recognize I'm in a place where I can afford that and many others simply can't.

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 6 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, depends where you live. Saskatchewan is the worst place, Quebec is the best.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago

Yep, doesn't make economical sense here yet. Better to put money towards air sealing and (the right kind of) insulation.

[–] Somojojojo@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Last I read, which was years ago, was they still struggle under -20C. Which is not abnormal for many places in Canada. How do these perform in wicked cold times?

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 minutes ago

Mine works fine.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

they still struggle under -20C. Which is not abnormal for many places in Canada

Yes, but that's why heat pumps in this country are typically paired with auxiliary electric heat. The heat pumps still contributes some amount, even at -30 or below, but the electric "tops up" the pre-warmed air that the heat pump makes.

And that is only really needed for a couple of months out of the year, even in places like Winnipeg or Edmonton.

20-30 years ago, the heat pump technology wasn't as capable, and couldn't do the job as well, but they have improves quite a lot since then.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but that's why heat pumps in this country are typically paired with auxiliary electric heat.

Yes, and although it's not very efficient to have auxiliary electrical heat, that's a small percent of the overall year.

If you live in a home that hits -20C for 20 days per year, that's really cold! But you'll probably need the heater on for about 180 days per year at that point. Putting up with less efficiency for 20-30 days per year is still a net gain if the other 150 days of heating makes up for it.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, a resistive electric heater is still ("just") 100% efficient.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but if some direct combustion of a fossil fuel is cheaper than electricity, then the actual dollars per unit heat will be cheaper with a fossil fuel source.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

but the electric “tops up” the pre-warmed air that the heat pump makes.

Is the heater at the hot end? The reason they crap out is that they can no longer move and vapourise their coolant, so I'd expect it to be somewhere else, probably the cold end.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

The ones I've seen, the aux heat is in the duct airflow after the hear exchanger.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I have a heat pump and furnace combo. The heat pump works extremely well down to around -10C. Below that it takes a very long time to move the needle by half a degree. The furnace doesn’t kick in until the thermostat sees the house temperature trending in the opposite direction it’s attempting to achieve.

Unfortunately, its method of determining the time gradient of temperature is rather moronic and doesn’t take the temperature schedule into account. This means every morning when the schedule calls for higher daytime temperatures (even by just half a degree) the thermostat freaks out thinking that the house is cooling rapidly and kicks on the furnace to bring up the temperature.

This causes the system to needlessly run the furnace every single morning. It annoys the hell out of me but I don’t know what to do about it. Aftermarket thermostats aren’t very common around here (Canada).

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

There are a variety of aftermarket thermostats available at Canadian Tire, many of which are quite good. The Home Automation enthusiasts seem to be big fans of ecobee, IIRC, and I have seen ecobee thermostats at CT.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I’ll check them out. I once applied for a job at ecobee without knowing what they did!

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Have you checked home automation forums? Some users are fanatics about tweaking stuff. Maybe there is a method or override option. Or see if you can get manufacturer on the phone.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

My issue is home insurance and HVAC regulation in Canada. I don’t know what is legal and what isn’t as far as HVAC system modifications go, given that I’m not a licensed HVAC technician. Doing my own home automation mods badly could damage or destroy either my heat pump or furnace, resulting in thousands of dollars in repair bills. Or it could jeopardize my home insurance in case of a fire and result in even greater financial losses, even if my modifications were only tangentially related to the cause of the fire.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Understood, the manufacturer may have a firmware update to solve the issue you mentioned

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

That’s a good point. I should look into that. It does have the ability to connect to the thermostat with an app but I never tried that.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Central heat pumps have built in electric heat in cases the heat pump alone isnt sufficient.

Even if the heat pump isnt enough all the time, its still better than heating with oil, electricity, gas, etc. exclusively.

It isnt an all or nothing situation.

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

That, and some heat pumps are better than others. The ones that use geothermal (lines run underground below the frost line) are more expensive but don't have much issue with the cold.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago

Last conversation I had on Reddit years ago a guy in Ottawa had data that showed that he was drawing heat during near -40C.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

Some heat pump models can work at -30C

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 4 points 21 hours ago

Many are designed for extreme temperatures now, but they are not efficient in such temperatures due to the properties of the refrigerants available. It will usually still run, but will run longer than usual and may not be able to keep up with heat demand. During a cold snap, might run continuously and may need frequent defrost cycles which further reduces efficiency and heating capacity. How cold they can/should go depends on things like sizing, refrigerant, building insulation, solar heat gain, and other factors. In a country like Canada, air source heat pumps will always be installed with a backup heat source. In Canada, that is most commonly the same natural gas furnace that the house was always originally equipped with, while the heat pump replaces the air conditioning unit, but backup heat can also be resistive electric, heating oil, wood, and more, and a decent thermostat will have an outdoor air sensor that can detect an appropriate outdoor conditions at which to switch from heat pump to backup/"emergency" heat when needed, and then back to heat pump when conditions permit.

In my experience, my heat pump provides about 90% of my heating from fall to spring. Only a few severe cold snaps put the heat pump on the bench for a few days switching over to emergency heat completely, and most of the winter it runs frequently to continuously to maintain consistent temperatures and only needs a short and occasional boost from the furnace. The gas backup is also nice peace of mind in case of a prolonged power outage due to a potential ice storm, as the furnace blower and electronic controls can easily be run off a small battery pack or generator for a very long time.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I wish I knew about heat pumps a few years back when we replaced our A/C and furnace.

But they, at least by the time I have to replace them again, maybe prices will have come down or the tech improved even more on these things 👍

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Do Canadian homes use mostly 120 V wiring like the US, or 240 V wiring like the UK?

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago

Mostly 120V, but some appliances require 240V.

Thermostats typically use 24V for controls which I believe is considered low-voltage wiring.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

120 for most applications but 240 for things like stoves, dryers, heat pumps, car chargers, etc.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Note that the 240V outlets in Canada are actually just two separate 120V circuits plus a neutral. This is different from a UK outlet which has 240V AC on a single conductor and then a neutral and a protective earth.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Residential Outlets are 120V which most household small appliances and lights plug in. Oven ranges, laundry dryers, air conditioning units use 240V. Essentially they have two inverted phases: -120V, +120V to supply 240V across the two ends, usually with a NEMA 14-30 or 14-50 type plug.

[–] hit_the_rails@reddthat.com 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I've always found this fascinating about Canada and the US. Both legs are +/- 120V potential to ground, and 240V between them. Here in Australia, everything in my house is 230V between active(hot) and neutral, both for plug in appliances and hard wired stuff like my heat pump (We call it a reverse cycle air conditioner here). Almost every house I've ever lived in has had one.

My old resistive clothes dryer just plugged into a standard 10A outlet like everything else. My current heat pump dryer uses 1/5 the energy though and has already paid for the extra purchase cost over the past three years.

[–] Yaztromo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The difference I would note is that in North America those 240V plugs aren’t likely going to be on a 10A circuit — usually they’re going to be more in the range of 30A to 50A, as they’re typically designated in homes for use by a dryer or a range (and if you’re lucky, in the garage for an EV).

That’s not to say you couldn’t run a lower amperage 240V circuit — there just aren’t a lot of practical uses for doing so (I believe some air conditioners only need 15A 240V circuits, but in my (limited) experience these are usually hard-wired, and aren’t plug-in devices).

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -4 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 13 points 22 hours ago

Most of Canada's power is hydroelectric and nuclear. 60% of Canada's energy production is hydroelectric, and Ontario has three of the largest nuclear power plants in the world.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 9 points 23 hours ago

It could still be fossil fuel, but they're more energy efficient than burning the fossil fuel directly for heat.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Given their vastly higher energy efficiency, they still reduce emissions even if running on fossil fuels by a significant amount.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

How does it even work, I can't understand it at all.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Intuitively cold winter air is cold, but that's just our perspective. From a physics perspective any air that exists anywhere on this planet at any time has still got huge amounts of heat stored in it (it's literally hundreds of degrees above absolute zero, the most blisteringly cold arctic air still represents a huge reservoir of physical heat energy even when it's cold enough to kill us). A heat pump doesn't care about how heat feels to humans, it uses physics: specifically evaporation and condensation of refrigerants to extract heat from the cold winter air outside (making that air even colder while the refrigerant absorbs heat from it) and move it indoors (making it warmer when the refrigerant releases the heat).

To use a water level analogy, the heat pump moves its heat out of an absolutely massive heat reservoir (the planet's atmosphere) that at any point might be slightly lower or higher than the level you actually want, and deposits the results of its pumping into a tiny reservoir (your indoor air) that it is responsible for controlling the heat level of. In both cases there is lots and lots of water (in the analogy, heat) available to pump around and the contents of your little tank makes no real significant difference either way, depending on how much water you need in that tank you can easily pump it in either direction you want, within reason, but eventually if the water levels start to get too different, you start running into practical problems with pressure and the amount of power you need to pump the water level up that high to overcome the height difference, and can also run into problems with inlets being uncovered if the water level drops too low. In the analogy this represents the range of temperatures and pressures where the refrigerant can still change between a gas or a liquid, which is determined by the design of the system and the refrigerant used.

Air conditioners do the same thing (in fact essentially ARE the same thing) as heat pumps, it just makes more sense to us intuitively because we're familiar with how they work, and are unfamiliar with the idea of this principle being reversed. Imagine if you put the hot-air blasting outdoor part of an air conditioner inside, and put the cold part that normally lives inside your house, outside. Now turn it on, and it starts working as a heater, and it's making the outdoors colder for no reason, and we call this "wasteful" but when you actually need heat it's actually not wasteful. So we add a reversing valve so you can make either end the hot side or the cold side, as needed, and you've got a heat pump. They sometimes select different refrigerants that are more efficient across the desired temperature ranges and they will have some different sizing considerations and mechanical needs to operate optimally, but fundamentally they're the same kind of machine, just with a slight rearrangement of the plumbing.

[–] Yaztromo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

From a physics perspective any air that exists anywhere on this planet at any time has still got huge amounts of heat stored in it (it's literally hundreds of degrees above absolute zero, the most blisteringly cold arctic air still represents a huge reservoir of physical heat energy even when it's cold enough to kill us)

Great explanation — the fact I always like to use along these lines is that there is enough heat energy in an iceberg to boil a pot of water.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Interesting, thank for the detailed explanation.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 12 hours ago

Flip your refrigerator inside out. That is exactly what is happening.

You need to understand the difference between "heat" and "temperature".

When you squeeze a gas inside a perfectly insulated container, no heat is transferred, but the temperature increases. If you allow the gas to expand again, it will return exactly to the temperature it started at. Again, no heat has transferred into or out of the gas, due to our (hypothetical) perfect insulation. The temperature has changed, but no heat has moved.

In reality, we aren't using a perfect insulator. When we compress the gas, the temperature of the gas rises. Heat starts flowing from the compressed gas to the container, and into the air. The gas is still compressed after the heat has left, but its temperature falls to ambient. This all happens inside the house.

The cooled, compressed gas is now piped outside. It is expanded. Because it doesn't have the same amount of heat that it started with, the temperature plummets. It gets extremely cold, far colder than the outside atmosphere. Heat from the atmosphere flows into the cold gas. The cold, decompressed gas then goes to a compressor, and the cycle repeats.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago

A bicycle pump or other type of air pump warms up when the air is compressed.

A spray can or propane cylinder cools off when the gas inside it is released.

Plug the two together in a loop, put some coils on either side so that heat (or lack thereof) can be easily exchanged with the space, and you have a heat pump.

A heat pump doesn't generate heat, it just moves it using the physics of pressure and state changes of a fluid (refrigerant). Moving heat in this manner uses less electrical energy than would be used generating heat from that electricity.

Heat pumps are very common. Refrigerators would be the most ubiquitous (heat pumped from inside to outside), but there are AC units, of course, and also clothes dryers and water heaters that are available.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Basically it doesn't produce heat by converting energy into heat, rather, it uses energy to move heat from one place to another. Hence the name heat pump - it literally just pumps heat around. The place where it gets the heat in this case is the outside. While it's usually colder than inside at the times when you'd want to use a heat pump for heating, it's still way more than absolute zero - the freezing point of water is 273 Kelvin, after all. This means there's always some amount of heat that you can 'steal' from the outside and pump indoors.

You may infer that this means that the heat pump is going to be pumping colder air outside, and you'd be correct in that inference. What's even more interesting is the realization that you can harness that property by running the heat pump 'in reverse' to cool a space - which is exactly what an air conditioner does. It's merely a heat pump that pumps the heat out of a space.

Here's a Technology Connections video explaining the concept even better than I could: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7J52mDjZzto

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Thanks for the explanation and link.