this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
141 points (100.0% liked)

science

23501 readers
397 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sometimes the hardest part of doing an unpleasant task is simply getting started – typing the first word of a long report, lifting the dirty dish atop an overfilled sink, or removing the clothes from an unused exercise machine. The obstacle isn’t necessarily a lack of interest in completing the task, but the brain’s resistance to taking the first step.

Now, scientists may have identified the neural circuit behind this resistance, and a way to ease it. In a study published today in Current Biology, researchers describe a pathway in the brain that seems to act as a ‘motivation brake’, dampening the drive to begin a task. When the team selectively suppressed this circuit in macaque monkeys, goal-directed behaviour rebounded.

Previous work on task initiation has implicated a neural circuit connecting two parts of the brain known as the ventral striatum and ventral pallidum[...] But attempts to isolate the circuit’s role have fallen short[...] In the new study, Amemori and his team used a more precise approach. They first trained two male macaque monkeys to perform two decision-making tasks. In one, completion earned a water reward; in the other, the reward was paired with an unpleasant puff of air to the face. Each trial required the monkeys to initiate the task by fixing their gaze on a central spot on a screen until the reward-punishment offer appeared. This allowed the researchers to measure motivation by how often the monkeys failed to begin.

Not surprisingly, monkeys were more hesitant when the possibility of punishment loomed. But that changed when the team used a targeted genetic technique to suppress signalling from the ventral striatum to the ventral pallidum. Although the suppression had little effect on the monkeys’ behaviour during the reward-only trials, it made them significantly more willing to start in the face of a potentially unpleasant outcome. The suppression did not, however, alter how the animals weighed reward against punishment.

If confirmed in humans, the findings could shift how clinicians approach one of depression’s most debilitating symptoms. Treatments often aim to restore enjoyment or reduce anxiety, yet many patients continue to struggle to start simple tasks. By pinpointing a circuit that selectively dampens motivation in the face of discomfort, the study opens the door to therapies aimed at lowering that barrier.

Note that the authors acknowledged that this is a smaller study that was done on only two male monkeys, so future studies should include females, find specific cell types, and find biochemical pathways across the signaling circuit

The paper (should be open access): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2025.12.035

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 47 points 13 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

Liar.. ;) Your circuit already knows: 1. that the article is certainly overly worded with complex terms and no fucking pictures or video to ease the cognitive load. 2. that it is SO much easier to just get an overall opinion from the comment section, and 3. maybe a few well-deserved feel-good likes will come your way..

Your circuit and environment never gave you a chance, buddy ;-P

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

When you do, just tell me what drug it says to inject into which vein.

[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Same, don't have the motivation needed.

[–] mmmac@lemmy.zip 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'll take one uhhh... Motivation lobotomy please

That was my thought.

Reminds me of the book Brave New World.

[–] unknown@piefed.social 10 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

How long do you think it will be till this is being tested on soldiers?

[–] rimu@piefed.social 4 points 5 hours ago
[–] Ach@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

It pains me that the only way I can refute this is that it probably wouldn't be worth the money to neurologically enslave soldiers since we're pretty fucking close to just having tech that kills way more people for less money.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago

It's cheaper than lying about funding their college education, but not as cheap as milspec meth. 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 41 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I've become so cynical in recent years, I find myself looking for the downside, and especially how this could be abused by the rich people who sell these "therapies".

No drug is developed under capitalism without the end goal of profit. The filthy rich have no morals. The power of the product will be abused. That is why we so rarely get pharmaceutical cures, only maintenance. If they provide an actual cure, they can't sell a lifetime subscription to the product.

I could expand and go on, especially regarding the current push for longevity drugs (imagine how that could be abused!), but you get the jist.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago

but it's also difficult to permanently change something in our bodies. just about everything only has a temporary effect. life is incredibly dynamic and everything changes over time.

[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 2 points 9 hours ago

I just want ~~slaves~~ employees to be more motivated. Give them the drug!

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 10 hours ago

For example, cancer research makes infinitely more money than a cure ever would. Literally. 🤢🤬😥

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What is the effect of lumping "discomfort" and "punishment" together?

From the abstract, it seems the procedure makes the money more willing to ignore the potential punishment, but they express this research as something on the path to test depression.

[–] zlatiah@lemmy.world 27 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not a subject matter expert on this so I had to look this up but... it seems that the experimental method was actually introduced over 10 years ago? They cited this paper (https://www.nature.com/articles/nn.3088) from Nature Neuroscience that I don't have access to unfortunately

I also didn't know this before, but it seems that maladaptive "approach-avoidance conflict" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approach-avoidance_conflict) has been known to be a symptom and a predictor of depression for a while (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165032706000139)

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 4 hours ago

Approach–avoidance conflicts occur when there is one goal or event that has both positive and negative effects or characteristics that make the goal appealing and unappealing simultaneously.

Oh man, that is just a description of my life since I became disabled. Every task. Every. Little. Thing.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, that's interesting! Basically they used a method that's standard in their field, that's good science there 👍

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 hours ago

Your concern about this isn't entirely misplaced IMO. I'm not a scientist/researcher, but I am a psychotherapist with a background in behavioural psychology and neuroscience, and it seems to me that these findings don't map onto clinical avolition (which is a persistent, punishment‑independent symptom) as the researchers suggest.

Using positive punishment as an externalized analogue for an inherently internal aversion seems like an overgeneralization. Additionally, they seem to ignore important distinctions between avolition and anhedonia, showcasing a lack of understanding of the clinical context in which they hope their research will apply. (Granted, they do distinguish between initiation and valuation, but then appear to ignore this distinction in concluding its relevance to MDD (when it's really only relevant to atypical depression)).

This isn't to say that the VS-VP pathway isn't a potential target for treating motivational deficits, but it seems unlikely that it would be for the reasons stated. It sounds far more applicable to demand aversion in conditions like ADHD rather than depression.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I’ll gladly take a few puffs of air to the face to human trial this. Sign me up!

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

I salivated when I read this.

[–] HylicManoeuvre@mander.xyz -1 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

What a shitty clickbait article, "this neural circuit" mentioning it not even once by name.

It's the VS-VP pathway btw

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 23 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Previous work on task initiation has implicated a neural circuit connecting two parts of the brain known as the ventral striatum and ventral pallidum

yes they did. Ctrl-F helps

EDIT: shame that 11 people upvoted this without verifying the accusation when it's so easy and even shows in the OP summary

[–] HylicManoeuvre@mander.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago

Fair enough

Still feel like they were burying the lede here

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 12 points 13 hours ago

This was a great way for you to prove that you don't know what VS or VP stands for lmao

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Previous work on task initiation has implicated a neural circuit connecting two parts of the brain known as the ventral striatum and ventral pallidum[...] But attempts to isolate the circuit’s role have fallen short[...] In the new study, Amemori and his team used a more precise approach.

What a shitty clickbait article, "this neural circuit" mentioning it not even once by name.

It's the VS-VP pathway btw

But 'VS-VP pathway' could mean anything!!1!

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Imagine that, wanting to make the article more accessible to people who aren't intimately familiar with such terms