this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
52 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

39672 readers
1067 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

^^^

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Colour palettes are collections of facts. Facts don't have copyright protection and ability to claim copyright for a collection is pretty tenuous. However, copyright may apply to certain related things.

For example: Suppose you see that someone is selling a Photoshop colour palette for money, and included the entire palette in the store image. In that case, there's literally nothing, legally speaking, stopping someone from prodding the image with a colour picker a bunch of times. But there would be copyright protection for the Photoshop palette file itself, because that's a more tangible piece of data.

There are also other kinds of intellectual property laws that apply to colours. Pantone gets away with whatever shenanigans they're doing because of trademarks.

[–] mr_jawa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Designer here - this above comment is 100% correct. The nuance is important that if a particular color palette is used in an original and distinguishable artwork that can be subject to copyright, although it’s a gray area. Colors can be trademarked however and that’s done all the time; for example McDs Red and yellow, UPS brown, The yellow of 3Ms stickies, DHLs red and yellow are examples. Those colors are only contestable if you use them on a similar product. You can color your dog house UPS brown without issue, but you wouldn’t get away with (for long) creating a delivery company with vans that color brown.

[–] redbr64@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

This podcast episode discusses this very question at length, along with a history of Pantone's pallette

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In Germany at least it's not copyright but a thing called "taste patent". As far as I know it can cover colors, shapes and probably literal taste as well. But it's not automatic like copyright. It's more similar to trademarks.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its Trademark Law in Australia.

For example Cadbury has a trademark protecting its purple (defined as pantone 2685C) from competitors in the chocolate industry. On the other hand Whiskas has one protecting its purple (defined as CMYK {40% C, 100% M) from competitors in the cat food industry.

Because its trademark law both only cover their specific industries (so purple would be fair game for a business in another field), but despite the precise definitions used for the colours they would be able to argue that a competitor using a similar purple could cause confusion in consumers, (so they effectively block out an area of the color spectrum).

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

I.e. Deutsche Telekom tried to stop other companies from using magenta. However, the court ruled that DT can't hold a patent on magenta as a whole, only their specific hue.

Ritter Sport is a sweets' manufacturer famous for their square chocolate bars.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Generally no, but I wouldn't rule out that it might be possible in a limited way in very specific circumstances. You wouldn't be able to stop others from using certain colors.

A specific color scheme might also be used as a trademark.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I don't think you can copyright a color, per se. You can trademark certain uses of color in certain schemes. For example, the walmart smiley is trademarked, but they can't go after people just using a yellow smiley. or like, Checker Cabs, with their yellow and black livery. (as mentioned elsewhere, the pantone colorset is trademarked.

Further, you can get patents for pigments- specifically, their production methods, and how they get bound into a solvent or whatever. For an example here- Vanta Black. If someone were to get their hands on some second hand, the people that make it can't stop them from using it, but they could go after another company producing it the same way they do.

Copyright protections are for works of art (or other works, eh.), and while there are plenty of monochrome works, part of what makes "art" ... "art" is composition. For example, in the sampling of monochrome, that first one is a blue panel set inside a white frame. Others, you see the single color is composed of texture. (the Yves Klien painting, for example.) Or, like Gerhard Ricther's solid gray which was expressly intended to convey... nothing (A lack of emotion or feeling, etc.)

But all of these are more than just the color they're painted in.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

I believe trademark would be the proper area for something like this. I don’t believe it would be enforceable, but could be weaponized to bleed someone of money via court. Not a lawyer.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are only 16777216 colors people care about. There are way more people than that in the world. We could live in a colorless society if 0.2% of humans decided to steal all colors

[–] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

I call dibs on green©

[–] hilliard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anish has entered the chat

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Doesn't he have a bean to flick?

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Shit, i would own a whole lot to Mr Viridis