23
Pixelfed.social and gram.social abnormalities (piefed.social)
submitted 8 months ago* by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hi all,

I'm still a fediverse baby and I am testing various fediverse platforms and accounts. Recently I tried to search my own pixelfed.social account from gram.social and was surprises that I see 2 photos from 7 on my profile. I see not likes count.

Why such inconsistencies? If pixelfed and gram shall communicate with protocol, why not everything is visible? That can give a user a false information because such searched account looks unused/abandoned.

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Is it possible the missing items are from before the account federated to gram.social?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    What does it mean? Gram account is from today. Pixelfed is 2 weeks old. Both public accounts. 

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Fediverse works like newsletters via email. If you search for an account on a different server, only the last few items are (sometimes) pulled and shown on your local instance. Only after subscribing/following that other account, you'll get new(!) updates sent to your local server. For older messages, you'll have to visit the other account's server.

    Maybe those 2 photos you see were shared with gram.social earlier.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    If it was shared/reposted, how would I know? 

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Any new shares/reposts would show once the account was followed from the gram.social server. Anything prior to that you would have to view the account on the home instance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Posts can also get synced if someone from gram.social searched for a direct link to a post. E.g. if you go to gram.social and search for https://pixelfed.social/p/pixuser/1234, it'll get synced in the background and show up if you follow @pixuser later on. (Depending on how long the instance caches it.)

    Likes and Reshares of external posts are local to their instance. Those won't get sent to other instances. E.g. on my private GotoSocial I don't see the correct amount of likes or reshares of posts from other instances. I'll have to visit the posts on their original instance for that. (But then, I rarely care.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] [S] 5 points 8 months ago*

    Just to add info. The two photos were not published after one another.

    I see my very 1st published photo and the 5th. Others are not visible from gram.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    I don't know whether people think this is a good or bad thing to do, but I follow each of my fediverse accounts from all of my other fediverse accounts. Like, I follow my Pixelfed account from my WAFRN account and vice versa, etc etc. Not trying to inflate my followers count at all, I wish it wouldn't, but just to avoid this very problem. So unless it's breaking some kind of fedi norm, I'd suggest to do that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •