Instead of AOC (however much I love her and her message) I'm thinking Whitmer would be better and has a great track record. Walz would be stronger than AOC, if they let him hammer 'em with his wit. Andy Beshear would totally freak the GOP out and would be a great choice.
AlreadyDefederated
As it turns out, being stupid is expensive!
No, that's crazy talk. We like to be surprised when we pay for taxes and tips.
Right. People with a gun in the house are more likely to be injured or killed by a gun, not less.
The human brain processes information by chunking - bundling up information into chunks to remember it. It's like a .zip file or compression on an image. That process is a bit lossy. If you've ever tried to write a technical document or a rules-set for a game, and had a user go through the document undirected, you'll see it in action.
The more complicated, technical, or tedious the instructions are, the more likely loss or misinterpretation will occur. A friend of mine says that writing a technical document is like programming a computer that skips every 7th line.
As a person who has written many of these, I've found ways to counteract / ameliorate their problems:
- the use of paragraphing important points that you want feedback on
- When sending to multiple people, but wanting feedback from a specific person, I bold, underline, and color their name next to their action item, so they know it's for them
- Using checklists or bullet points
- explaining things through multiple avenues, like with visual images and with text simultaneously
I hope this helps!
Well you'd get Hillary in 2008 instead of Obama - which might not have been terrible. Could she have beat McCain? Probably.
Yet, when they're both fried, they both magically become "pommes frites," n'est pas?