i WOULDN'T say anything against stalin or xi jinping - they're both mixed bags. i really hope that's NOT mean. seriously!
DylanMc6
joined 5 days ago
i had to take that leftvalues quiz again for this comment:
Q: Some small scale destruction of nature is acceptable if it notably benefits humanity.
A: don't destroy nature, please - disagree.
Q: Foreign officials have no right to dictate policy in another country.
A: i think they should - strongly disagree.
Q: 'Socialist organizations are generally better off when organized loosely and decentrally.'
A: maybe, maybe not - neutral/unsure.
Q: Revolutionary violence is acceptable as long as the final outcome is positive.
A: i think government reforms should be necessary for the switch to socialism, but if the government tries to suppress it, we might as well reluctantly use force in a revolution - neutral/unsure.
Q: Mass spontaneous actions are more effective than carefully planned actions.
A: i think actions should be planned - neutral/unsure.
Q: Nationalism and patriotism are impulses that are unacceptable in a socialist society.”
A: you can be socialist AND support your country - neutral/unsure
Q: Revolution is the best way of achieving a socialist society.
A: ...if the government tries to suppresses socialist reforms - agree.
Q: Measures to address environmental issues are unacceptable if they result in significant decreases in production and quality of life.
A: no comment - neutral/unsure.
here are my results - still got 'centrist marxism':
basically:
revolution vs. reform: NOT anti-revolution, but i support reform (with revolution being an option for when the government suppresses socialist reforms) - leaning towards reformism. shoutout to eduard bernstein.
scientific or utopian?: scientific, probably
central vs. decentral: who cares? everyone just want a say in the government
international or national: very internationalist
party or union?: still both!
production or nature: leaning towards ecology
progressive or conservative: progressive
oh and what meds were you taking, and is there any reason why?
can you explain?
i would, but i CAN'T go outside without permission - i'd help with the organizing, but i will NOT attend the protest, sorry. seriously!
what do you mean by that?
vivian wilson (elon's daughter) should start her own social media site just to watch her father squirm, and people will go it a lot more than twixter.
if this were a socialist country, elon musk would've been in jail. seriously!
at this point, we must all reluctantly use force to stop oligarchs around the world. seriously!
have you used bitview?
can we organize?
can we use force?
we need a revolution. seriously!
just several days ago, after 7 posts and at beast 150 comments, i (under !DylanMc6@hexbear.net) got banned from hexbear for "History of repeating US state department talking points, anti-socialism and zionism".
this ban came after some of my comments were deleted for either "zionism", "fedposting" or "manufacturing consent" just a week ago.
after my hexbear account got banned, i continued to post stuff on hexbear communities through this account (!@DylanMc6@lemmy.ml) (because lemmy is part of the fediverse which means i can log in to a different lemmy instance with this account), and just earlier today, a couple of my comments (about charlie kirk) that i posted on !slop@hexbear.net were deleted for reasons of "Liberal civility politics".
hexbear also deleted another comment i posted there where i said "we should segregate clankers from society", as well as another comment for the reason of "libertarian" simply because i put "left-libertarian".
left-libertarianism is a form of libertarianism that combines individual freedoms with social equality, and can be used to mean "antiauthoritarianism" - an example of left-libertarianism is libertarian socialism which supports self-governance and workers' self-management.
although i support left-libertarianism, i find collectivism to be pretty interesting - i think that individuals are worthy of respect and freedoms, but i also think that the individual CANNOT organize alone - collective action is very necessary.
most of me realized that what i said on hexbear can be misunderstood as "us state department talking points, antisocialism and zionism", and i apologize for that.
on the other hand, part of me is very glad that i got banned from hexbear because obviously, some people there is extremely hardline.
i apologize to any hexbear people reading this, i just had to do a rant here. seriously!
edit: here are the modlogs (for this account and !DylanMc6@hexbear.net):
view more: next ›
i think that there'd still be multiple political parties, but all of them would support different forms of socialism/communism (from across the socialist spectrum); they'd still cooperate together in a 'vanguard coalition', led by the communist party which serves as the foremost social institution), but they'd still compete in elections and such.