Exactly. This is one of the fundamental things that I never understood about Gemini. It's simply a "web" that doesn't support some of the features of the modern web that the author finds objectionable. I have no problem with anyone doing that or with the author's objections but they did a lot of work to do what could have simply been done with a specific set of tools and "rules" applied to the existing HTTP/HTML web.

• Create a standard for what subset of HTML standards are supported and maybe define some headers for these pages to use to enable crawlers to identify them
• Build some browsers that only support the standard subset
• Build search engines that only index pages that contain the smolweb headers defined in the standard
• ???
• Profit

Yeah, neither is great. Needs to be called something like "Employee Business Relations" maybe?

100%. The rebranding of some HR departments as "People Officers" or "People Team" drives me bonkers. When push comes to shove, they will always protect the interests of the business before the interests of the employee. Full stop.

I don't think anyone's arguing that Red Hat isn't in the right, legally, to do what they did (anymore). At this point, I think Redhat users are just tired of being jerked around. We're not children, most of us in the industry have been around a while and have seen this same story play out over and over again. We can see the writing on the wall and they've destroyed the trust of their community so, a long winded blog post defending their decision, arguing that they are within their rights to do it is largely irrelevant at this point. They've lost the narrative and the industry (us) will respond by gradually finding ways either away from or around Red Hat and associated projects. Soon, the only people left using it will be the same people who use other irrelevant and dated software, government.