FreedomAdvocate

joined 2 months ago
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

No, I don’t remember that. What are you talking about?

Why would Nvidia make DLSS work on other brands hardware? It’s hardware dependant btw - it needs their cuda cores.

No, not the same with Linux. Nvidia GPU support is known to be bad.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I went from a 2080 Super to the RX 9070 XT and it flies.

You went from a 7 year old GPU to a brand new top of the line one, what did you expect? That's not a fair comparison lol. Got nothing to do with FSR4 vs DLSS4.

AMD is at least running the smart game on their hardware releases with generational leaps instead of just jacking up power requirements and clock speeds as Nvidia does.

AMD could only do that because they were so far behind. GPU manufacturers, at least nvidia, are approaching the limits of what they can do with current fabrication technology other than simply throwing "more" at it. Without a breakthrough in tech all they can really do is jack up power requirements and clock speeds. AMD will be there soon too.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nvidia gpu's actually work out of the box when you use them with windows.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago (8 children)

First: https://www.corsair.com/us/en/explorer/gamer/gaming-pcs/rtx-5090-5080-and-5070-series-gpus-everything-you-need-to-know/

What exactly am I supposed to be looking at here? Do you think that says that the GPUs need their own PSUs? Do you think people with 50 series GPUs have 2 PSUs in their computers?

It’s not innovative, interesting, or improving performance, it’s a marketing scam. Games would be run better and more efficiently if you just lower the requirements.

DLSS isn't innovative? It's not improving performance? What on earth? Rendering a frame at a lower resolution and then using AI to upscale it to look the same or better than rendering it at full resolution isn't innovative?! Getting an extra 30fps vs native resolution isn't improving performance?! How isn't it?

You can't just "lower the requirements" lol. What you're suggesting is make the game worse so people with worse hardware can play at max settings lol. That is absolutely absurd.

Let me ask you this - do you think that every new game should still be being made for the PS2? PS3? Why or why not?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You didn't actually answer it though. Are you arguing in bad faith?

The obscene concentration of wealth is bad for the stability of the country.

How?

The existence of billionaires is a policy failure.

How?

And there’s no world where they exist without them being able to influence politicians

There is though - the world where politicians aren't corrupt.

If all of the issues with billionaires come down to politicians being corrupt then the problem isn't billionaires, it's corrupt politicians like I said. Billionaires aren't the only ones that can bribe/influence corrupt politicians.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 week ago (16 children)

Calling DLSS "anti consumer" is one of the dumbest things I've read about PC gaming in a long time.

And there’s no doubt There is a certain elegance to AMD’s cards

What exactly do you mean by this?

I’m not sure what you’re comparing at the end unless you meant a 9070XT which I don’t use/have and wasn’t comparing.

Sorry I thought I read you had the 9070 XT, which is better than the 9070 that you have. The 9070 and the 5070 are the same price, and are neck and neck in performance , so the nvidia card isn't "insanely overpriced" compared to AMDs offerings, is it? The 9070 isn't a "fraction of the price" of the equivalent nvidia card, it's the same price.

As you said, there are 40 series cards that are better than the 50 series cards apart from probably the 5090, and the prices on those is cheaper than the 9070.

view more: ‹ prev next ›