FriendOfDeSoto

Danish has entered the chat. They don't pronounce anything the way it's written either. And French consists of 80 percent silent letters or thereabouts. It's not just English in Europe.

Consider the needlessly complicated to be applied on top of a general baseline of needlessly complicated that applies to any language.

While they don't have gendered nouns, they have something equally unnerving for the beginner learner. Their noun classes evolve mostly around the nature of shapes and sizes, which becomes an issue the moment you need to count anything. For which there are two systems, one of which stops at ten, and the other is highly irregular in its forms. And don't get me started on the calendar. English is relatively unsophisticated by comparison.

It's not an easy language to master even if you lived full-time in Japan. Everything about the language is needlessly complicated. The grammar, the writing system, the social conventions that influence word choices. Anime Japanese is its own kettle of fish. Overly colloquial or stylized samurai talk - neither of which you'll get taught in most language courses.

Now, you could be a savant who picks it up in no time. More likely you'll be in it for a couple of weeks and give up - or life. It's not a bad hobby. Even beyond Duolingo you'll find plenty of resources online and lots of it free.

Back pay is not helping that much when your mortgage is on the line today/next month after you have exhausted all your savings. Of which I'm gonna guess post covid there aren't that much. Your soldiers are going to suffer bad. Your go fund me idea is honorable; I don't see it making enough of a dent. That would presuppose a level of knowledge among the general public, an awareness of these issues, and I don't see that either. In a way, it's that lack of awareness that gave the world Orange 2.0.

The Republicans have the stronger arm in this arm wrestle. I don't like it either. Their people don't care if you chop off their fingers if at the end they can say they owned the Dems. If education works here, go for it. I don't think the time frame is long enough for this to work. They've already swallowed veterans getting less health care and that their favorite valet José has been sent to El Salvador. Are grocery price increases not outpacing inflation? They aren't issue-based, they are vibe-based and the vibe is own the Dems.

In theory I agree with you. I'm not parroting anyone, I'm trying to look at this realistically. This is not the first shutdown rodeo. And it sucks if your team feels a certain level of responsibility to the country and all its people, which is more than I can see coming from the clown car load of people currently in charge. At some point the leadership of the Democrats will feel the damage to continue is going to hurt them more at the ballot box than to package a turd of a compromise in shiny wrapping paper. I want your vision of the Democrats but I think we'll get mine unfortunately.

I don't doubt that. My crystal ball tells me they will compromise at some point for the good of the workers, for the good of the country - whichever line works best at that moment. I wouldn't want them to do that but I'm pretty sure it will pan out that way eventually.

There is a process called reconciliation that gets triggered in the senate in a budget impasse situation. I would say it typically involves a whole lot of horse trading but at the end is a bill that can pass with a simple majority. So I don't think either party will be able to drag this out indefinitely or just to the midterms.

Dragging this out generally is a bad idea for Democrats. The cult following of stable genius is going to accept the negative consequences longer as long as they get fed a narrative along the lines of "we prevent immigrants from getting health care and drain the swamp of lizard people." Or whatever. The Democrats will feel their feeble support dwindle when unpaid government workers are done with their savings, which will happen before the cult runs out of patience. The whole battle is mainly fought on the backs of people whose only fault was choosing a career in government. The Democrats will take pity on them and eventually agree to the least dehumanizing compromise you can negotiate at the "12th" hour.

If you care about things beyond the operations, the Proton boss came out in support of 47's adminstration with regards to regulating big tech IIRC. I'm not aware the Mullvad chief did something similar.

Proton works well. But it's designed to be the basket for all your eggs (VPN, office suite, email, etc.). They want you to use all their services and push for upgrades to the highest tier. I found their customer support you be ... very ... slow.

If you need port forwarding, AirVPN is another option. I think they're cheaper than Mullvad but it's held together by dedication and duct tape. It works okay but read their website first to see if you're okay with how it's set up.

Neither of us are legal scholars, are we. If I pretended to be one, I would say the government acting as a user on somebody else's platform or the government running its own platform are different enough circumstances not to derive comparisons from.

In summary: you have the cooperation of the parents, you cannot exclude the existence of a mental issues, and you are allowed to spray the item then. These are conditions I put ahead of any other suggestion.

No, I would not want to join such an instance but I wouldn't mind its existence. Nobody could really federate with it. So you create a niche server in an already niche environment.

I am not convinced the conclusion "if the government runs it, the first amendment has to apply" is apt. Even if the server was run from under the house majority leader's desk - which I don't think it would, this smells more like an outsourced undertaking - moderation on the platform is not "making a law." And proprietors of platforms are legally compelled to moderate in certain cases, e.g. when illegal stuff like child sexual abuse is involved.

There are at least two discussions going on here simultaneously. Is the process of a beefed up spell checker sucking up all the data the same as an artist looking at what had come before, before either of them churn out new art? I'm inclined to agree with you; the process does seem similar enough. The difference remains that one is a statistical model and the other is a human being. So even if the process appears similar enough, they are two different types of player and I can also agree that we should not treat them the same. One is able to throw constant massive amounts of spaghetti at the wall as long as there are chips and power and the other is limited by their health and more limited processing power. So where the compromise lands in this discussion simply isn't clear yet. And while you and I can discuss this, I can say for myself at least I'm not smart enough to see where this goes eventually.

The other discussion is how all of it collides with existing copyright/trademark law, which is essentially different in every country. Constitutional rights, like freedoms of expression and the arts, are given to real people, not computers. But at least one supreme court in this planet has made corporate money a form of free speech. So eff knows where LLMs end up.

This is new territory we're in. And I fear that's why it will take another decade until we get a legal landmark decision or a political compromise that will be similar enough all around the world.

The law mostly disagrees with the memes = theft. A lot of it is covered through freedom of speech and fair use. If you have taken a bit of content, changed it a bit, recontextualized, and reposted it, you are most likely in the clear. Especially if the original content was publicly posted. This gets less clear if you are using the likeness of a private person but this will also depend on context. Where in the world you are, if this content was captured in a public space or from something published - the list goes on, like some stuff can be trademarked as well, and I'm no lawyer. A lot of these things run under the legal doctrine of "no plaintiff, no judge." I feel artists in general have accepted that anything they post online is just potentially gone. And if no one steals their content to make money off it, they're not going to hire a lawyer, whom they cannot afford.

And I'm not saying any of this is great but that's an established status quo.

The reason why so-called AI generated art gets decried is twofold. It's new and we don't like new things. And in order for it to be created, the models have to suck in all the training data they can. And they don't tend to pay for it. So that's where some people see theft happening. But that's not settled law yet because it's fairly new, there are plaintiffs but not enough judges have passed judgement yet. Do they have to pay for stuff that's publicly available? Where is the line, if any? Is imitation of a style okay if there is more to the work than just copying something from Studio Ghibli or Disney? These questions are going to keep a lot of legal professionals in bacon for a long time still.

This shit is hard. It's more gray than black and white.