GiuseppeAndTheYeti

joined 2 years ago
[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I hope this doesn't come off as being snarky because I'm trying to give genuine advice from the audience you're probably trying to target but it'd be a good idea to include this bit anytime you're presenting that graphic:

The fear and greed index is based off of technical measurements of various active markets.

Very broadly, it is telling you whether or not the financial class, investors, stock traders, corporations significantly involved in that, your 401k managers... are acting fearful or greedy.

It does a good job of summarizing what I'm supposed to gather from the index.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 3 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I believe you, but having never encountered this index or representation before. I have no fucking clue what it's trying to tell me. Is it showing whether the public is fearful of the economic momentum or feeling greedy? Greed doesn't seem like a good thing.

This would be funny if it wasn't so depressing.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I bet she's just a moron

I literally just argued the opposite with my FiL. I think property should be illegal to inherit. If you have multiple children, you usually end up with a disagreement on what to do with it and how to split it up. It allows the consolidation of property for wealthy families.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 30 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

You're just factually wrong. Now you may have an argument that someone that's driving drunk may be a better driver than someone that's a bad driver while sober, but alcohol impairment reduces inhibitions, increases reaction time, impairs motor control, and alters judgement. That objectively makes you a more dangerous driver compared to your sober self.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 21 points 6 days ago (8 children)

You're the one making claims lol. I'm not going to waste my time arguing with someone paid to spread disinformation. Or maybe you volunteer. I've got not idea. Either way, since you made the claim, the burden of proof falls on you. We'll wait.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 42 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (11 children)

Okay less than a day old account with an adjective_noun username. Cause you're argument is surely being made in good faith lol

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think I understand now. Thank you! I will be changing my paths then. It's kind of a moot point since I'll change my paths anyway, but for the sake of my own curiosity, i have a follow up question. Feel free to disregard it if you don't feel like taking the time to answer.

Hypothetically, my docker setup only allows jellyfin to see /mnt/user as /storage. So jellyfin would report the path to Morbius as being:

/storage/hdd1/media/movies/Morbius_all_morbed_up.mkv

when in all actuality it would be:

/mnt/user/hdd1/media/movies/Morbius_all_morbed_up.mkv

My intuition tells me that the file path that jellyfin "sees" would be the security risk. So "/storage/hdd1/...." Is that correct?

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Can someone ELI5 this for me? I have a jellyfin docker stack set up through dockstarter and managed through portainer. I also own a domain that uses cloudflare to access my Jellyfin server. Since everything is set up through docker, the containers volumes are globally set to only have access to my media storage. Assuming that my setup is insecure, wouldn't that just mean that "hackers" would only be able to stream free media from my server?

It was Snowball! He snuck into our group chat under the cover of night and sabotaged our great ~~windmill~~ war plans!

view more: next ›