Vielleicht die Infrastruktur verstaatlichen und die Befahrung, also den Service, in privater Hand lassen mit genügend Anreiz für Firmen es gut umzusetzen.
Harlehatschi
But going peacefully on the streets is only successful if the government you want to send a message to is listening, i.e. if it either cares for their citizens or is in any way rational.
I hope I'm wrong here, but I can't see anything changing for the better in your country. It currently looks like 70 million people trying to talk through a knife fight.
The only field I see LLMs enhancing productivity of competent developers is front end stuff where you really have to write a lot of bloat.
In every other scenario software developers who know what they're doing the simple or repetitive things are mostly solved by writing a fucking function, class or library. In today's world developers are mostly busy designing and implementing rather complex systems or managing legacy code, where LLMs are completely useless.
We're developing measurement systems and data analysis tools for the automotive industry and we tried several LLMs extensively in our daily business. Not a single developer was happy with the results.
That might be the case. But more often than not it's WAY too easy to see that a decision is bad to argue that we can't implement any measures against that.
In this case we "just" need laws that prohibit that any infrastructure can be dependent on few foreign entities and had to be completely independent if reasonably possible. Diversification or elimination of dependencies as a law.
You can't rely on foreign proprietary software like Teams for public facilities and infrastructure if there are reasonable alternatives.
You can't rely only on Russian oil if other countries are available for trade.
Absolutely!