Yeah, so it might be something else, IDK. Good luck!
MRLimcon
One thing, always use hardware acceleration.
Does it get better if you set in about:config:
dom.ipc.processCount
anddom.ipc.processCount.webIsolated
to your number of threads on your cpugfx.webrender.all
totrue
fission.autostart
totrue
I think it would, in my suspicion, make a better use of your cpu (the threadpool would be more efficient in the processcount), using the new renderer (webrender) and possibly make it a little more secure with one thread per website (or something, i don't remember exactly) using fission.
Yeah, but the people that are doing this gave this power to him, putting people in the government that are loyal to him, not to any other person in congress/supreme court.
He took the government like Sulla, took out any person that he disliked and put loyalists there. Sulla divided the Senate, etc, but after just took the power from them. This book and CGP Grey talk in a way of following some rules that are out of the window and I think this situation is more like what Maquiavelli describes in the "taking a new state for yourself", he cleaned the slate, this people have only institutional power, but there are no more rules as the people in real power, in the executive branch, are totally loyal to him.
He told AIPAC to go fuck themselves (metaphorically) and seems to dislike Netanyahu, this is unprecendented for the fascist party, but not to him. He took their missiles and sent them to Ukraine. I think he took absolute power already, The Heritage Foundation and the other republicans can only complain, I think he makes the rules now.
This is my analysis, but only the future will show.
Edit: Just hope for the bad luck of a "fanatic", as Machiavelli describes, to kill him.
The data showed on that image contradicts this, it says "percentage change in homicides and police killings since 2015". This is very clear language, "since 2015, this is the percentage change in homicides and police killings", not "difference between homicides and police killings in this year to 2015".
I'm talking about the original chart, not this chart specifically, the language is implying different things, probably showing things that are not real, based on the text that was given.
"as other homicides fell", but shows growth rate. This is just disinformation from the media (New York Times), homicides grew not "fell", by its own chart.
This must be intentional, because no one would do this using this chart. Is it implying that police killings reduce other homicides? (based on this contradictory chart)
Edit: chart
The race is on a loop, you only pass each point one time. You get from the starting place and return there, passing at each point 1 time, what would be the shortest/fastest path? That's the problem.
You can probably put weights on the fuel efficiency, based on the cargo weight, distance/speed he can drive (based on the experience and expected value for him), fueling stops, etc. Just add that to A* and some tinkering, I think you could make a good algorithm.
While we laugh at this guy, he's gutting the remaining US healthcare.