IDK, the second half of that first sentence sounds like a good thing, and long overdue
MachineFab812
joined 2 years ago
It didn't say subscription-based, but more power to you.
My original comment was more off-the-cuff than anything, but really, the system empowered neither woman. BOTH missed out on getting a proper resolution(the case was dropped) to the presumed rights of a ghost, of all things.
The woman doing the suing did so on behalf of the estate of a man. Women disenfranchising women via patriarchy isn't "women having the rights they should".
I despise id-pol in general, but this is basic stuff, and historical disenfranchisement NOT being used to distract from the failures of Capitalism, for once. Yes, Gloria Steinem was a CIA psyop, but that doesn't invalidate the points feminism makes.
Anything to disenfranchise a woman.
*Yawn. * Attacking Trumps character does nothing to convince anyone to vote for the other guy. It's a distraction from those fascist policies which the Democratic party doesn't really want to change, which is basically all of them.
Guatanamo was supposed to be closed TWO Democratic presidents ago, Student loans forgiven four years ago, and neither of them did much of anything for the Israeli/Palestine two-state solution backed by George W BUSH, of all people.
HOW THE FUCK ARE WE SUPPOSED TO BACK ONE PARTY THAT’S BEEN GLADHANDING GENOCIDE OVER ANOTHER? Not Happening
... and that's what the non-leftist "leftists" don't get. There's no point emphasising a talking point from a conversation that's already been had.
There's no point addressing Trump from the angle of "Well i would never vote for him because..." That's great, but see, the rest of us asked why we should vote for the OTHER guy/gal when their party is gonna change fuck-all.
Guatanamo was supposed to be closed TWO Democratic presidents ago, Student loans forgiven four years ago, and neither of them did much of anything for the Israeli/Palestine two-state solution backed by George W BUSH, of all people.
HOW THE FUCK ARE WE SUPPOSED TO BACK ONE PARTY THAT'S BEEN GLADHANDING GENOCIDE OVER ANOTHER?
Not
Happening
Y'all spend so much time on character assassination, and near-zero time distinguishing "leftist" policies, and therefore candidates, from fascist ones. Its pathetic.
Bush W snorted cocaine. Obama smoked pot. Made zero difference their times in office.
The Executive Branch's (ie, the President's) capacity to felonize anyone is precisely why we can't keep felons out of public office. Meanwhile, millions of felons who have paid their debt to society, and more, remain unable to vote.
I hate the fact that so-called leftists are still using the felon thing as a talking point. At least it gives you neo-liberals/neo-cons a way to out yourselves I guess.
Imagine thinking Tesla has all-that-much in place to prevent those things in a stock configuration. Full-stop, any self-driving is one of the first features anyone trying to disconnect their cars from Tesla servers would lose outright.
Insecurity for who? I mean, yeah, the police cracking down on the protestors is a great look ... 🙄
view more: next ›
Sorry I lack the time to make something more complex or even enjoyable at the moment, but this should be enough for you to understand how easy defeating that strategy can be.