Yo I get what you're going for but I think the age of the father and age gap between the parents aren't nearly the same red flags as the other stuff
OlPatchy2Eyes
I've heard lots of chess content creators make claims like 'you don't need to study openings until like 1600 elo. You don't lose games because of a slightly losing opening, you lose because you still blunder your queen.' I kind of get it, but if it was ever good advice, it's at the very least outdated now. At 1100, the first thing I see in sooo many games is some sort of scholar's mate-esque opening trap and if I don't blunder outright, I often need to burn a minute or two to evaluate all my options while my opponent clearly knows the flowchart of the opening. It's a big disadvantage.
"Mbappe hits the back of the net, but the flag's up! Half of the French team celebrate while the other half yell at the referee about an offside call. Remember, due to the Schroedinger's offsides rule changes that Lemmy user akademy implemented, the goal is both scored and not scored until after the Progressive Insurance VAR review. Let's see the replay... looks like about 90% offside to me... yeah, VAR has determined a 10% chance of a valid goal. The ref is reaching for his Prime Energy 10-sided die... IT'S A 10! Mbappe completes his unlikely hat trick with a third high-roll! France have surely won it now!"
Lil bro can't google a line