PixelPilgrim

Oh okay. I did have a conversation I tried to explain a litteral conspiracy and I kept getting called a conspiracy theorist

well i don't say that its orchestrated or premeditated, its generally that group wants to feel part of a group and they look for signs that they're part of a group. the "tipping point" is a comment (or even a downvote on op replies) and then people that seek approval align themselves with the largest group.

I told the anti ai crowd that i was going to make an ai bot somewhere on the fediverse just to see how people would interact with it fedizens, simply to satify my curiosity, so that's the context. i just telling people "you're being an asshole to me and making demands from me while I'm just trying to hear you out, so i don't feel like changing for you"

ehhh i wouldn't it way to start and angry mob and sometimes i dont trust mods descension. since even servers with no rules will make up reasons for a ban

yeah i noticed they tend to go after certain posts and they need to be primed by either downvotes or a comment. the rude people will be quiet if you make safe posts but if they get a hint that there other people that don't like you then they dogpile. i noticed a good way to trigger it is to basically say or imply you do things without their approval or you dont care what they think

i noticed that too. i chalk it up to people are always seeking approval and they want to tell express to everyone how the think and feel in hopes that people will express the same. its not everyone id say at most 30%. also you have to keep in mind that this is where the reddit rejects go (i can say that word because i got banned off of reddit lol).

another user got mad and attacked me for saying "my morality and logic is different" and said nothing about why my differences is bad.

I actually didn't pursue a an llm ai project because the suggested model needed like 32 gigs of ram (i dont have that and i dont want to by a machine for that project).

i jokingly call llm ai dubious linear algebra. i try to see an arguement against llm ai, like i sided with the writers guild in the strike and I can sympathize with ai trained on their work taking there job so they lost out on income and job they want, but im a socialist so i believe that the economy should provide them a house and food without having to work and that shouldn't need to rely on writing gigs to survive

I'm trying to think if that has happened to me, but I try to keep it simple like "i dont understand what you mean my X are you saying Y?". that probably gets me different set of interactions. One time I even tried humbling myself and just say "I'm still learning all of this and trying to figure out my mistakes..." and such ill get bereted(by strangers). i try to power through the insults and just ask what they mean and it still comes off as you being offensive

yeah i see that marx said

[doing away] with all repose, all fixity and all security as far as the worker’s life-situation is concerned; how it constantly threatens, by taking away the instruments of labour, to snatch from his hands the means of subsistence, and, by suppressing his specialised function, to make him superfluous

but that's marx just saying industrialization is threating working class. im not seeing much myth just boring explanations of workers relation to machinery

I do use perplexity and chatgpt to code a lot. i really rather not go to stack overflow and try to understand three posts and figure out an implementation. I'm fine with that being automated

Yeah if you have better way of doing anything with no drawbacks you should do that I'll just say out of pure reason.

Thinking about deterministic results. I can think of a flawed code that gives a wrong result deterministically 1 out of its thousands of potential outputs and you can determine that 1 wrong answer is A) not big enough flaw to fix(code is good enough) B) not worth fixing since it's rare (too much effort to fix). Now how that applies to LLM is that you can see the what LLM outputs and determine it's execution is good enough or not working.

Using a lot of resources at the cost of the environment is more a value thing. Cyanobacterial didn't care about poisoning the environment with oxygen. Ironically I don't think the electric grid should be restructured for ai since I don't think so is doing anything important enough to warrant changing the electrical grid.

I would care if someone was rude or unqualified on an issue. Id want to know why something I did was wrong, either technically or morally, or if there a better way of doing and why it's better

It's actually a good graphic. I'd put a legend explaining some of the fediverse icons. And 2 sentences explaining that each fediverse icon communicated with other fediverse icons

Class solidarity is hard to archive. It's funny seeing people get mad at my tiny little projects when the government is out there ruining people's lives

The AI models are so nice I swear at them when an issue I cause by not reading the the instructions they have and so is just like "I know your getting frustrated, let's try this approach" and calmly repeats the instructions.