SevenSkalls

joined 1 year ago
[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago

The archive link didn't work for me.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Maybe we shouldn't have the public square controlled by a bunch of private owners.

 

It feels like 10 years ago, /r/cscareerquestions was full of people falling over each other to worship FAANG and their super high salaries. The tech field in general has always felt very full of chuds to me, or at the very best libertarians.

Maybe things are changing. This question was if the Big Beautiful bill would be good for software engineers.

Will Trumps big beautiful bill benefit software engineers?

Was reading up on the bill and came across this:

The bill would suspend the current amortization requirement for domestic R&D expenses and allow companies to fully deduct domestic research costs in the year incurred for tax years beginning January 1, 2025 and ending December 31, 2029.

That sounds fantastic for U.S based software engineers, am I reading that right?

Almost all of the answers are negative, with some even using a class analysis. One or two bad answers or course but still, if tech could gain some sort of class consciousness, and identify themselves with the working class instead of the petite bourgeois or labor aristocracy, there may be hope for them yet.

All the top answers I've seen so far:
mpaes98 says:

It will benefit software engineers ^at ^Palantir

Then all of the replies to this are insulting Palantir lol.

jarena009 says:

Well...US Corporate profits are currently up to $4T, and white collar/business professional jobs, especially in tech, are still down since 2023.

Meanwhile many of the major tech players are doing layoffs.

Do you think increased corporate profits, say to $4.4T or $4.6T, are going to result in more tech jobs?

Do you still believe in trickle down economics?

SenorSplashdamage says:

. And even if our wages went up as engineers, most of us still have family that will end up being impoverished by all the other effects, especially health care. The overall losses will exceed any gains in personal salaries.

randomuser194 says:

In theory will be beneficial in that way, you just have to ignore all of the negative factors to the overall economy because of the bill

Wallstreet says:

Wild to see the difference in this sub from just ~5 years ago to now.

Back then: People’s complaints about this sub was that a lot of people would post the 5 massive offers they received then they would just say: don’t compare yourself to these posts, you don’t have to grind leetcode for hours, 80k offer for a no name company is good enough

Vs now: this sub is just a bunch of posts about people struggling to find a job and now grinding leetcode is the norm, and if you’re not doing it, you’re the problem

mau5tron says:

No. Every major tech CEO sweet talked trump and threw a bunch of money at Trump's campaign with the promise to keep AI deregulated. Those tech companies are then going to keep dumping money into an unprofitable technology and call it an "R&D" expense, then lay off a bunch of engineers and still get their tax cut. And like clockwork, they'll buyback a bunch of stock to keep stock price at a steady level while the economy goes to shit. Trickle down economics has never worked bro. People are just hoarding at the top.

LeadVitamin13 says:

When companies and the rich save money they don't pass it on they hoard it. Its like thinking tax cuts will increase hiring when they don't. Maybe for a struggling company that need extra help but couldn't afford it not tech giants. If they can do a job with X amount of people why would you hire anymore just cause you got more money.

LeftcellInfiltrator says:

Yeah, it'll free up trillions for the booj to invest with. But you'll be programming robot jailers with the soul of Peter Tiel to whip Amazon indentured servants into being more productive instead of solving any real problems. This is already happening in research.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In addition to what others have said, and maybe help explain the why, I don't think Iran really knows how to stand as alone and self-sufficient as the DPRK yet, which has been ostracized and sanctioned since it's founding.

On the other hand, Iran has always been a power player in the region and heavily involved in international politics. They traded with Russia and the British for a long time, and I think China as well. Then they developed a relationship with the US, who ended up helping establish the Shah, a Western puppet who sold off a bunch of his own country and was terrible in many ways, but did lead to even better Western relationships and a place in the neoliberal world order.

Their current isolation didn't really happen until after the Islamic Revolution, when the US started getting a little tired of the Shah too, and then Bush's axis of evil speech. All the huge sanctions are a relatively recent development, so not sure they've quite learned how to live when you're isolated like the DPRK has. Imo they should be making much better friends with Russia and China than the weak purely economic BRICS agreement.

Their revolution was also more religious, not class-based like a communist one would be, which I'm sure preserved a lot of the contradictions other people are mentioning, like reformist liberals or bourgeois who would love to be back in the Western sphere still having a lot of power, so they make deals like the nuclear treaty, even though any communist would know that even if the US didn't break it with Trump, they would have some other reason to either attack or sanction eventually. That's how imperialism works because that's how capitalism works. It doesn't mean don't make those treaties and diplomacy, but do it to give yourself more time to defend yourself militarily and build self-sufficiency, not with the expectation the West will let you join their club forever.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

Oh I see what you're saying. I thought you were saying 12 different states, as in different countries. I've been reading a lot of international news lately.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I feel like the US would take over California again if that was the case. It's why they like to split up their enemies, to make them easier to control (Korea, China, all the gulf states and parts of the Ottoman Empire, Yugoslavia, etc.).

My personal view is yes, California should leave. I feel like California has the best chance of turning into some sort of Democratic Socialist state without the rest of the US holding it back, and it's big and rich enough it could possibly actually defend it.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 37 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So how fucked is Iran if the US joins? I assume they'll start off with just Intelligence support, the flying fuel tankers, things like that. But the US is capable of dropping a lot of bombs. China seems content to just sit and watch the US continually take out all their allies before they get to them, so doubt they will help. Russia is still preoccupied with Ukraine. And without Iran, Gaza is doomed (not that they did much to help during the genocide, but at least the state not turning into Syria helped out other actors who did do something, like Yemen).

I'm so sad by this constant war, but this constant destruction by these fascist entities in Israel and the West. They won't let anyone just live. Everyone must bow or die. I'll probably have to switch off this particular news for a bit for my own mental health, but I'm afraid I'll miss some cool victory by Iran, too.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's hard to call it pure orientalism when we literally just saw the same thing happen in Syria. We know the playbook works.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well that's not good. Iran barely handle Israel, let alone both Israel and the US.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was that from her "don't come here" speech?

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

I'm sorry that my past self ever got annoyed at these purges. I'm sorry, Stalin. You were right. Otherwise, this is the result.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Iran is really bad at this. Tbh, now I'm wondering if they're going to survive this war as a revolutionary entity. Regime change is possible at this point just from Israel killing everyone but the collaborators, who are no doubt high up in the ranks as well.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

Wow that's a lot.

 

I watched the Andor Season 1 Recap in anticipation of my season 2 watch (I'm only on episode 3 so no spoilers yet) and I've felt more hope than I have in a bit. Maybe it makes me a lib, but the lines from the manifesto especially felt poignant at this point in time.

The combination of those lines about thousands are joining battalions without realizing it, and the protests and LA fight back against ICE, idk, it's helped offset some doomer I've felt lately. I can't wait to finish this show.

 

I don't know if they're scared of Zionist counter protestors, or the state cracking down and arresting people, me losing my job, or what. Tbh, those are all fair reasons to be nervous, but I can't just keep reading about stuff without doing something. I know protests don't do a lot, but I feel like I should do something to start coalition building, organizing, and doing stuff on the streets with actual real life people. And I feel like I have to for all the people who can't for other reasons (social anxiety, disabilities, work schedules, etc).

On the other hand, we have a lot of debt, and I have a job that relies on government funds, plus I'm not the biggest guy, so I understand why she's scared. But I doubt anything will happen and I'll take precautions (leave phone in car, maybe wear a mask). Anyone got advice on how to navigate a relationship situation like this?

 

Tried to cross-Post from Hexbear. Doesn't work well with Jerboa.

I don't really have a specific question, I'm just wondering how Laos is. Do people have any thoughts, interesting facts, or information about it?

So the context is that I've been doing a re-watch of King of the Hill, where Hank's neighbor is Laotian, at the same time I've been listening to the latest season of Blowback, which is about the area formerly known as French Indochina, but more specifically Cambodia and Vietnam. They don't really talk about Laos much, which makes sense.

In King of the Hill though, there's a couple references to a communist dictatorship in Laos. I just finished an episode where a former guerilla veteran is trying to recruit Laotians in the US to go back and fight this government. One of the funny parts to me, is that whether that government is bad or good but poor as a result of historical conditions, I see Kahn as the kind of person who would be wooed away to the USA with Hollywood images of the American Dream. He seems to work hard, but is obsessed with status, success, and commodities. Anyway, it's not a political show, so combined with that Blowback season, it's just enough information to get me curious lol.

I could review Wikipedia but it tends to be biased against communist nations, and I'd rather supplement boring scrolling of articles with interesting conversations. Especially since it's in the same general area as one of the most based communist parties I've studied so far (in Vietnam) and probably the worst one I've studied so far (the Khmer Rouge).

 

I don't really have a specific question, I'm just wondering how Laos is. Do people have any thoughts, interesting facts, or information about it?

So the context is that I've been doing a re-watch of King of the Hill, where Hank's neighbor is Laotian, at the same time I've been listening to the latest season of Blowback, which is about the area formerly known as French Indochina, but more specifically Cambodia and Vietnam. They don't really talk about Laos much, which makes sense.

In King of the Hill though, there's a couple references to a communist dictatorship in Laos. I just finished an episode where a former guerilla veteran is trying to recruit Laotians in the US to go back and fight this government. One of the funny parts to me, is that whether that government is bad, or good but poor as a result of historical conditions, I see Kahn as the kind of person who would be wooed away to the USA with Hollywood images of the American Dream. He seems to work hard, but is obsessed with status, success, and commodities. Anyway, it's not a political show, so combined with that Blowback season, it's just enough information to get me curious lol.

I could review Wikipedia but it tends to be biased against communist nations, and I'd rather supplement boring scrolling of articles with interesting conversations. Especially since it's in the same general area as one of the most based communist parties I've studied so far (in Vietnam) and probably the worst one I've studied so far (the Khmer Rouge).

view more: next ›