Well, yeah, obviously they wouldn't get the subsidies anymore, I thought that was implied in gaining independence
Either way, they should still have the right to decide themselves
SkyeStarfall
joined 2 years ago
Oh 😭 lmaooo
I think vision would fall girly within the realms of physics. I don't know if you can justifiably call it visual anymore when it incorporates magic
It's like, if there's magic bow that launches arrows at a far greater rate than it normally would, would you say that the energy comes from the buildup and release of tension in the wood? There's another element there, which enhances the thing
That would fall under "nonvisual perception"
That's actually not the worst. It seems doable to produce that much square area of solar panels, even for a civilization like us. We need about 500 000 square kilometers of solar panels on the Earth's surface to power our global electrical needs. This is within the realm of possibility
The more tricky part is to actually position it around the sun, that part is what makes it impossible for our current tech level and space infrastructure
Who said you need to catch all of it in a single panel??
The reason nasa goes overboard (though, not really), is because it's worth it for space stuff. On the surface we have an abundance of space
Who is controlling the American government right now?
How do you know you don't have it? Tests are barely even able to detect it, with a high false negative rate. There's a reason it's not part of the standard testing regiment
Considering just how massive China is, they probably have the best shot at a truly independent "internal world" economy
Like what? Do you think the current leadership listens to reason?
view more: next ›
Well, in that case I do agree with you. If they gain independence, the subsidies should stop. I mean, that's only natural
And yes, I don't think it would be a wide choice for greenland to do, but ultimately they should still have that choice, otherwise it's just a glorified colony