SonOfAntenora

I imagined. Probably it's better to have a public one where you have the kind of things they want to see.

Well well this is a recent account after all, so it is possible. Also, I do have a public social media, but it's either used for messaging or it's empty (follow - only).

It's going to be weird when there's no handle or social media at all. I nuked my social media around 2020/2021, I was legit tired if people posting travel pics and pretending everything was alright. Oh by the way one could make a fake page just for this, but deep down we know we don't care.

You have no choice there. Outside of web pages it's undersupported. Is it the fault of the file format or of software that doesn't support the format?

Alright, the site itself is legible, but if you find it hard to read you could use ublock or the archive. is website. It's also a short article.

Apple intelligence was the first apple product that truly felt like a complete lack of vision and practical application on their side, since i can remember. Even their vr headset had a basic idea to support it. This was so meh, we couldn't even tell what it actually did, other than acting as a proxy for some multimodal llm.

AI companies than blog and social-media posts. (Ziff Davis is suing OpenAI for training on its articles without paying a licensing fee.) Researchers at Microsoft have also written publicly about “the importance of high-quality data” and have suggested that textbook-style content may be particularly desirable.

If they want quality data then, don't kill them. Secondly, if they want us as gig workers providing content for AI, don't act surprised when people start feeding gibberish. It's already happening, llm are hallucinating a whole lot more than the earliest gpt 3 models. That means something, they just haven't thought about it long enough. If a reasoning model gets stuff wrong 30 to 50% of the time, with peak of 75% bullshit rate, it's worthless. Killing good journalism for this is so dumb.

CSS is mostly evil when you have to center elements in the page.

Indeed, they do have a tax. But it's essentially a tourist trap / tourist heaven now, a giant partying hub with few notable events that appeal to the 'haute culture' that, somehow, feels consumeristic in nature.

I know but you see what they're doing with ai, a small server used for piracy and sharing is punished, in some cases, worse than a theft. AI business are making bank (or are they? There is still no clear path to profitability) on troves pirated content. This (for small guys like us) is not going to change the situation. For instance, if we used the same dataset to train some AI in a garage and with no business or investor behind things would be different. We're at a stage where AI is quite literally to important to fail for somebody out there. I'd argue that AI is, in fact going to be shielded for this reason regardless of previous legal outcomes.

Cool than, try to do some torrenting out there and don't hide that. Tell us how it goes.

The rules don't change. This just means AI overlords can do it, not that you can do it too

I knew toki pona would make its way in these places faster than natural languages (and esperanto). Thanks for sharing!