Tamps

joined 2 years ago
[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago

However, after 14 years of uninterrupted growth, we are now seeing a decline of unprecedented scale and speed.

So basically, we made a lot of money over a period of 14 years but we don’t have any left to sustain our business model. I wonder where the money went? Business planning? What’s what?!?🤔

Can’t blame TIGA, they’re doing their job as a trade body.

If the government were going to intervene, I’d prefer to see it support indie devs and make that sustainable option for people to try new and interesting things and hone their craft.

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

When I pressed him to consider the social consequences of his work, he acknowledged that he and his business partners had discussed contingency plans for laid-off workers. Those who are higher-skilled could be used to train the next generation of robots, he said. He did not say how he would deal with lower-skilled workers.

As government subsidies flood the robotics sector, Chen and his peers are bracing for the usual pattern: price wars and cost cutting manoeuvres that leave companies barely able to turn a profit.

I’m curious as to what’s at the end of this race to the bottom. If workers are steadily being excluded from the job market, and even those running the companies are being forced to narrow their profit margins, the implied goal is to make a lot of stuff that nobody has time or money to use. I guess there’s some competitive advantage of economic dominance on the world stage, but it feels like even that is on shaky ground for one reason or another.

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

(if this is a done deal, and I'm not sure it is) It would seem unadvisable for Audi to let Wheatley immediately go to a competitor who they've got a good chance of finishing ahead of. So I'd presume there'd be a lot of haggling over how soon he could join. Given the likely rate of development this year, perhaps people's knowledge will age faster than previous years, but still!

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 56 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Or to put it another way, AI is making it faster and easier to do the wrong thing in the wrong way at scale.

I also wonder what the plan is when the token cost starts going upward. The bill for all this venture capital will come due eventually and someone has to pay for it.

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago

Can confirm this works with Navidrome. I also have Navidrome updating last.fm as well.

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago

This is good news! I quite like the Quest 3 hardware, but I hated having Horizon rammed down my throat through the UI. I guess that’s because they were desperate to drive engagement.

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 22 points 2 weeks ago

The other thing the helps people get unstuck in games is good game design. 🙃

I suppose this is just the equivalent of reading a game guide that someone has written, but this feels like it could remove too much friction. Are you playing the game if everything just becomes a tutorial?

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Won’t stop the competition suggesting that Merc should be nerfed mind you. Interesting to hear Lewis mentioning compression ratios in the post qualifying interviews. 😅

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I presume Mercs main defence will be that McLaren has the same engine and isn’t as dominant.

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago

Quali should be good if they're still learning where the limits are.

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago

I thought it might be part of the rear diffuser. Hope they have some spare underfloors given the amount of people going through the gravel. :)

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes, fair comment. If they have to retire the car because it's shaking itself and the drivers to the point of failure, questions will be asked. So some of this is getting on the front foot and manage expectations. But I am baffled how how naive AM could be regarding the strength of Honda coming back into the fold as an engine supplier. It's more likely they were set to struggle than not given they're essentially in a rebuilding phase having lost personnel to RB.

As you say, the vibration issue is potentially masking any other problems, and Newey seems to think that the chassis is a step ahead of others, but we won't really know until this is resolved. And the lack of running is doubly punishing in terms of gathering data and insight. I guess I'm just wary because this feels very similar to the McLaren & Honda situation where Honda carried all the blame, only to find that McLaren had other performance issues outside of the PU.

 

This looks like it's set to get worse before it gets better.

 

“My hope for meaningful change to the governance of Welsh rugby has all but disappeared. My faith in the current leadership of the WRU has disintegrated. It’s quite clear now that the leadership of the WRU is not going to do anything radical (even if they use this word) or change the future structure to anything other than a smaller-scale version of what we already have.”

I’m not sure I agree with everything in this, but there is a niggling voice in the back of my head that the WRU isn’t going far enough and fast enough to truly improve the future of the game in Wales.

view more: next ›