[–] 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

more in the comments

I already disliked the original [Harry Potter] for its lack of rationality as a child (how can they have magic and poverty at the same time?) so I loved the flip.

OK so does HPMOR solve poverty? (Q is rhetorical don't answer)

If you didn't like HP check out Grossman's The Magicians. A lot of graduating magicians there join non-profits or hedge funds.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    just a peeve

    here's a personal blogpost on LW entitled "Three types of AI risk: why (some) leftists are against (some) AI regulations" (by "sudo-nym" which I admit is a great nick)

    First sentence

    You may have seen factions of the left being opposed to current attempts to regulate the AI industry, despite the fact that they clearly also want to stop AI.

    OK Mr Sudo-Nym, if that is your real name, imma gonna stop you right there

    Which "factions"?

    Are these factions actually in existence, or are they just Xhitter/Bluesky handles? If you're provide like, I dunno, sources, we could maybe evaluate this ourselves. It would also clarify whether these are US leftists as opposed to leftists in other countries which are in my experience a bit more attuned to both political realities and have a more theoretical foundation.

    As it is it feels as if you're fighting windmills in your imagination.

    Commenters point out that the "frontier labs" are actually raging capitalists so there's that.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago

    I think the advent of photography decimated a particular genre of painting - portraits, but it was still a tail-off. The middle classes could get photo portraits done but they were only B&W and small (a Daguerreotype is basically twice as big as a standard photo print) and still quite expensive. So if you wanted a big color portrait of a loved one, you still had to commission a painting. Same for landscapes.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    More disucssion about AI safety over at LGM

    https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2026/10/ai-safety

    comments are a mix, some smart generalists incorrecting each other. I have not bothered to comment because I'm not an active part of the community, but I'll share here that Rofer's recommendations about safety we can apply now would presumably help us contain Robot Satan should it deign to be created. Lots of commenters don't really draw that conclusion. This is pointing out the yawning void between the intense interest among Rats to devise the perfect alignment and their disinterest at mitigating harms ocurring right now.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    I think deep down these people think PR is unethical , because the world is always better if everyone tells the Truth, so having to massage the message is Bad. Same think for voter preferences - having to appeal to the average voter instead of only listening to the people who have read and internalized the Sequences feels deeply wrong and I really don't think these people have enough imagination or empathy to change that.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    In a since deleted thread on another site, I wrote

    For the OG effective altruists, it’s imperative to rebrand the kooky ultra-utilitarianists as something else. TESCREAL is the term adopted by their opponents.

    Looks like great minds think alike! The EA's need to up their google juice so people searching for the term find malaria nets, not FTX. Good luck on that, Scott!

    The HN comments are ok, with this hilarious sentence

    I go to LessWrong, ACX, and sometimes EA meetups. Why? Mainly because it's like the HackerNews comment section but in person.

    What's the German term for a recommendation that's the exact opposite?

    view more: next ›