Honestly it wouldn't have been allowed back then except for the fact that an openly gay man who could pass as straight was still a novel and funny idea.
As a sidenote Neil Patrick Harris is a million times worse in Harold and Kumar, but that somehow aged better on account of everything in those movies being comically offensive.
"Millionaires row" could also describe any collection of homes on Long Island above 2000sqft at this point.
No. However if you're the type of person to ask in this question, you should be invested in a target date fund. As part of the way they attempt to hedge for retirement, the include exposure to international funds and bonds.
How I met your mother aged extremely poorly. The ending rightfully gets a lot of flak, but the characters are just massive toxic assholes in a way that isn't really funny.
Also I'm like 90 percent some of the ways Barney convinced women to sleep with him could be classified as rape. I get the joke that Neil Patrick Harris was gay, but it's still uncomfortable to watch. Oddly enough I don't get the same feeling when I was Neil in Harold and Kumar.
On the flip side Scrubs aged surprisingly well. It has problematic moments that you'd think would get ridiculed in the modern era, but hits the emotional beats hard enough that it manages to still remain watchable. Also the joke about clowns and whores is still fucking hilarious.
I feel like they need to break this down by age a lot more than they do.
In today's day and age, it's perfectly normal for a parent to offer significant financial support to their 20 year old child. While adulthood technically begins at 18, society is structured in a way that encourages some form of education/training through the rest of our teens and early twenties. A lot of this time adults in that situation will be setting themselves up for success, but not in a position where they currently have meaningful income. Parents helping out enables them to lay the groundwork for being independent later on in life.
On the flipside a 30 year old receiving relying on their parents is a wtf moment 9/10.
Another consideration is independent adults moving in with their parents for the purpose of acting as a caregiver. While that's a problem for society, it's a completely different problem than adults needing parental contributions to survive.
That's actually exactly what I mean. Eight years ago is "almost a decade". Since his defeat in the 2016 democratic primaries:
Dude has had massive political and social pull for a long time now, and has very little to show for it.
God if this doesn't summarize Bernie's career in a nutshell; A viral empowering moment that feels amazing on first glance, but in reality it's just a virtue signal. Absolutely nothing of consequence was accomplished, and absolutely nothing meaningful changes.
This man has been in Congress for longer than I have been alive. He's had serious pull in the democratic party for almost a full decade now. At some point platitudes don't cut it.
There's absolutely no way he's adding enough value compared to Joe MBA to justify that compensation.
Dude should have just added comments indicating that the code was part of some security test but was unfinished and extremely dangerous.
Change a few file names, add a comment how it will never run under normal circumstances, and you've got plausible deniability.
Honestly I have a lot of sympathy for these people.
It's one thing to invest in some moonshot crypto. It's another to invest in something claiming to be FDIC insured. There's also not a good way of verifying that information to the extent the victims would have needed to know something was amiss.
It seems like the FDIC was asleep at the wheel, and didn't really know or give a shit that someone was leveraging them to mislead consumers. Instead of actually fixing the problem, they just washed their hands of it.
You can call Trump the devil all you want, but the system was broken long before he came on the scene.
This article almost feels like gaslighting.
Disney has put out a ton of content that follows the same power. It generally can be summarized as "put out overpriced mediocre garbage, hamfist some culture war stuff in there, and then imply anyone who doesn't like it is some sort of deplorable.
This movie:
The most ridiculous part of this is the trailer for Lilo and Stich, a movie that is a million times more minority forward than the Snow White remake, dropped to largely positive reception. 2024 is going to be simultaneous "Snow White failed because of bigotry" and a movie centered around two woman of color, and unconventional definition of family, and Hawaiian culture prints money hand over fist.