minorkeys

Not really. They just keep pushing in a direction that makes it inevitable and then blame the people who resist for the violence they then inflict. They would rather everyone just do what they want without complaint. But if the law is broken and someone keeps stealing all your stuff, you have to either let them or try to stop them. As soon as you try and stop them, they'll claim you started the violence. There is no winning against this, violent resistance or slavery seems inevitable.

Which would only intensify the situation and draw other states into the conflict.

You have NASA FFS. Just fund it.

They will always want you to watch more ads. Doesn't matter that you literally pay them not to. Manipulating your purchase habits is more profitable than your subscription is because your tolerance for ads sets the amount they can sell.

Ads are brainwashing. They sell companies access to your brain case and it's always been a disturbing behavior.

This is something mentally ill people do. Racism alone doesn't account for mounting their dead dogs heads, burning down their home and then killing them.

Quiet down bot. Your comments are irrelevant to the topic at hand.

No, I'm saying he already chose the working class and it hasn't galvanized the working class to support him by a significant majority so I'm not sure it would have worked for Kamala. Bernie probably would have won a small majority, but done no better than corporate candidates have because the working class doesn't seem to galvanized behind a candidate that does choose them.

I don't have a ton of confidence the working class would choose someone who did choose them. Bernie is that candidate, and shenanigans aside from the dem primary, he didn't swing a landslide.

Aktually...