mukt

joined 4 years ago
[–] mukt@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

No. I am describing a global system that goes beyond state.

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

When I was younger, I once imagined a universal court which would be above all supreme courts, but without any government backing or any force to enforce.

The sole criteria it would have is that the case before it has been studied by supreme court of any nation, and ruled in violation the principle this court observes. This court would then study the case and then rule punishment to the accused AND penalty to the erring judge of the supreme court. The enforcement of its will shall happen in the good old American way of bounties and bounty hunting.

It was quite detailed, but the relevant crux here is that enforcing justice doesn't need dedicated manpower or government backing.

However, a specified court/judiciary is definitely required for a legal recognition.

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

I usually work with MS formats on LO (only because they need smaller space for small files, in larger files, MS formats are objectively bulkier). My observation is that MS messes with formatting of files made on LO, no matter which format you pick... even with whitespace of otherwise plain unfomatted text at times.

It is definitely a MS issue, and it is not about formats they have made public.

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago
[–] mukt@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 days ago

You need to answer my preceding post if the pretense that this is a rational discussion from your side has to continue.

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

If you are exploring, I'd suggest giving Unexpected Keyboard a try. You might like it even though there is no autocorrect.

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Both India and Pakistan took away autonomy from all princely states under their control respective control. I don't see any reason to single out one Princely state.

If you have any logical principle which singles out Kashmir, but not any of the others, please state.

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Which particular claim?

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml -5 points 3 days ago

It is justified. Another matter that the justification doesn't respect sovereignity of Pakistan - just like Pakistan army doesn't respect its democracy.

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Tourists of Pakistan always hear local fairy tales. But they can't tell the real status of Kashmir they have made 'azad' from India, anf then sold to China like a medieval feudal lord from Mohammad's era.

view more: next ›