I didn't say there are never any issues I said it's fine. The idea that "success stories" are only amd is silly. 90/100 times unless you're using bleeding edge hardware or pathologically fussy you just hit play and stuff works. 9 out of the remaining 10 times you tweak a proton version or wine setting, the other time it's a driver bug.
naevaTheRat
What? I have a 2060 and shit runs fine. Nvidia's drivers have improved a lot since the 2010s.
Tigers also lick their own bums clean, is that a good thing to do? Tigers don't have dentists, so humans have no right to dentistry.
Or maybe you mean to say that hurting other people for your own pleasure is only ok if you do it close enough to see the whites of their eyes? Does a single tear need to roll down your cheek.
You are so stupid it actually hurts me. If you want to argue about the morality of killing you could at least pretend you have read a book.
I tried to use it to write software to rotate my screen in a way that would please me and if I wasn't an experienced sysadmin the code it produced would have destroyed the computer's battery in a year or so.
That was this year.
Everything it makes is bad, the prose is awful, the orthography bland, the code mediocre. Any factual query I have made has had at least one critical error a non expert would miss. They are machines for giving idiots false confidence, atrophying your own skills, and producing the sort of aggressively mediocre writing one finds on reddit.
I think it is fucking hilarious to be proud about making yourself dependent on an industry that literally 450 billion dollars in the hole and 2 companies. I am sure that'll work out well for you.
historical materialism
There's actually a really good method of analysis that is highly predictive about the actions of classes of people politically.
Personally I prefer clankerwankers but whatever works.
I also think slopmachine is a good slur for llms, given it highlights the gambling aspect and addictive potential.
But... you didn't take a look at the report and were talking about the most anodyne interpretation when they
a) explain why 18 b) explain the scope c) break down the kinds of attraction by age group d) break down the kinds of offences
Asking if you looked at the report and what you thought about one of the most shocking things is completely reasonable.
Why did you have to be so rude and smug earlier? you hadn't read that part of the report so you didn't have a good reason to assume I was making shit up.
I copied the title of the authors in that piece, I don't want to inflame people, I wanted a discussion of something I found extraordinarily shocking.
Would have sexual contact with a child younger than 10 years if no one would find out (4.0%)
page 12, midwit.
It happened the other way because the vast amount (97%) of convicted offenders are men, and that expert consensus is men are vastly more likely to offend. People have limited time and money, so research is funded when it is able to clearly state its impact.
I wish we had infinite resources in the academy, but we do not.
Humanoid robot wars are so silly. Afaict they're mostly propaganda. The allure is slick sure, would be neat to not have to retrofit spaces for robots. Unfortunately it's much more cost effective to make spaces for robots than jam robots into human bodies. In how many applications can a humanoid robot compete with a robot arm and a self driving trolley?
The only spaces we can't really customise to robots are houses, and these things will never be affordable. We'd be better off designing bathrooms that clean themselves (or that are just easier to clean) than robots that clean bathrooms.