I don't know what you are using the card for, but I don't think you will be able to saturate that pcie5 speeds. In gaming and everyday usage at least you won't be able to spot the difference.
passepartout
joined 10 months ago
Es gibt Dutzende von uns!
I'm not sure if deleting the account on github would be the best option. They could use it as mirror and link to the forgejo instance where active development takes place.
I'd go for Matrix, with Element or Schildichat (not the next gen versions for now) as clients. It's federated, which means you can choose which instance you want your account to reside on, end to end encrypted, has (video) calls, and some other features you wouldn't necessarily expect from others like spaces for groups with several group chats, prioritizing conversations (low, normal, high / favorite) and threads inside a conversation.
Their FAQ says kind of:
Many other devices are supported by GrapheneOS at a source level, and it can be built for them without modifications to the existing GrapheneOS source tree. [...] In most cases, substantial work beyond that will be needed to bring the support up to the same standards. For most devices, the hardware and firmware will prevent providing a reasonably secure device, regardless of the work put into device support.
The requirements that GrapheneOS has on the hardware, like relocking the bootloader and hardware level access, should be part of rights to repair / digital markets act imo. They are even considering producing their own hardware in the future.
Aktuell würdest du dir damit leider eine riesengroße Zielscheibe auf die Stirn malen.
Besser schauen welche Dienste man so nutzt und dass alles E2E verschlüsselt ist.
Sendergruppe deren Inhalte niemand schauen sollte verkauft altbackene Zeitschriftenformate die niemand lesen sollte an Verlagsgruppe von der niemand was kaufen sollte.
Those do not have to cancel each other out necessarily. The open and modular design of Application APIs in AOSP lets the user decide which way they want to interact with the devices they own compared to the walled garden. Graphene does an excellent job by leveraging this design with further encapsulation while focusing on baseline compatibility and keeping up with google. Sadly the last one is a difficult task, so some features may take their time, while others we may never see.
That's interesting. Apart from the pathfinding, Osmand behaves kind of sluggish for me and I had to get used to the UI/UX which can be overwhelming at first (even for tech savy people). But therefor its also a lot more sophisticated and feature complete which I also like.
To each their own, maybe even both ;)
view more: next ›
Edit: I thought this is about data and not the storage media itself lol.
Obvious answer: It depends.
One individual can have TBs of storage assigned to them, like a cloud storage with years worth of high res family photos or videos, or TBs worth of... homework and Linux distros. This would be nearly useless / cost more to gather than it has a value.
On the other hand, a group of people can have mere kilobytes of text messages between them that is potentially worth millions of dollars stored on a server, like trade secrets or war plans.
A special case to consider: The data of John Doe type individuals I described first can be a valuable asset too if its not one individual but a big accumulation of thousands / millions of people, especially of they can be made comparable to one another. We see this in advertising and will probably realize this value more and more in crowd surveillance and control / opinion making. Especially if all of this data gets analyzed and reduced to machine readable tokens, possibly even on the users end devices, which means the data gets more valuable and more compact at the same time.
My final answer would be: It effectively ranges from negative to positive millions / billions of $ per any given unit.