pastaq

Whamp whamp What's new pussycat...

Then they should say they hate flatpak, or they are frustrated/disappointed when something they are interested in is only on flatpak.

Instead of doing that, they said they hate people who only use flatpak. Words matter, and that kind of entitlement needs to be shut down. The devs don't owe them anything and they certainly don't deserve hatred for their packaging solution. There are many constructive ways OP could resolve the issue. Open a feature request issue on the bug tracker, build it locally, send an email, offer to maintain another packaging method, etc.

You hate people who spend hundreds of ours of their free time developing software, who then release that software for free, under no obligation to you or anyone else, and your reasoning is because they provide it in a packaging solution you don't find ideal?

Maybe fuck off and write your own software.

Yes, but not on SIPRNet, which was my point. Even inside a SCIF "SIPRNet" is too low a classification network for this discussion, and SIPRNet can be accessed outside of SCIFs in spaces cleared for up to Secret.

Well, ish... SCIFs are used for the collection, dissemination, and storage of Top Secret/SCI material. Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet) is only cleared for up to secret level material. There are higher classification networks they should have been using instead.