The simplest way would be for the remaining countries to raise their contribution. And perhaps have a review of the executive salaries.
qyron
I grew being told, playfully, that if fried a shoe would taste nice. But no. Too much of a good thing is bad for you.
Not an american but, apparently, still as much confused as you are over the concept.
Large Language Model
To the extent of my understanding, it is a form of slightly more sophisticated bot, as in an automated response algorithm, that is developed over a set of data, in order to have it "understand" the mechanics that make such set cohesive to us humans.
With such background, it is supposed to produce new similar outputs if given new raw data sets to run through the mechanics it acquired during development.
Nice.
This reminds me: weren't pet rocks a thing at a certain time?
I'll gladly admit cassowaries are 1) awsome 2) scary 3) capable and willing to kill a human but they are not on the same category birds of terror were.
Yes, cassowaries are modern dinossaurs, as in birds, but not birds of terror.
p.s
After writting and reading what I wrote, I realized I played myself.
Cassowaries are in fact birds of terror; I'd probably end dead and soiled if I ever crossed paths with one, and nothing says things would happen in that exact order.
But cassowaries are definitely not Terror Birds.
Most people do.
The closest we can find if an european common culture is that we share a mass of land and our ancestors have been lusting after eachother since... well, just pick a date.
The EU can be strong by finding common ground where we can agree and respecting we will never agree on others. And that is fine. If we find the strenght to emulate what is made well in other countries and slowly push towards a better, negotiated, future.
You're describing me but I am not autistic. Can we again just say it is just a bad idea all together.
Strangely enough, we seem to forget the Terror Birds were a thing.
Just look at a chicken. They are just waiting for an opportunity to bring those recessive genes back.
I'm very critic of the AI craze. Too much hype, money, time,energy and effort put in to get very little from it. And considering most LLMs are trained on stolen intelectual property, that makes it even worse.
LLMs are tools. The people using such tools give it personality, a semblance of agency, see what is not there and start to consider a tool a form of life.
I've seen people pour so much of them into a local model, the bot develops a quasi clone of their personality. But the program is not the person.
Please, stop making bots what they are not.