Especially one that’s now selling your data. If Mozilla did this instead of selling our personal information, that would have been great. But here we are.
something_random_tho
joined 2 years ago
It’s my understanding that most insurance doesn’t cover “acts of terror.” So wouldn’t this mean Herr Trump and Musk will need to cover these costs out of pocket, based on their own words?
Man pages are still not great on Linux. Very few examples with common use-cases and explanations. I shouldn’t need to visit the Arch wiki.
OpenBSD man pages are a delight in comparison, and really all you need to learn how to manage the system.
Hard to imagine how anything could be worse than the current state of things.
VOO (S&P 500 index) is down 6.5% this month. Reddit is down 36%. So it’s dramatically worse than the rest of the market.
Needs more eyeliner.
The US is actively threatening Denmark/Greenland. It’s time for Denmark to shut down the US military bases there.
Hetzner is great and way cheaper than the big clouds. Managing your own servers is a great skill to develop, and you’ll save tons of money too.
Does that 100 score in America include Flint, Michigan?
Bolt is great in Portugal
view more: next ›
They tried to weasel out of saying that they sell your data, claiming that the CA law has an absurd definition. But the CA law just defines the term how any reasonable person would: the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) defines “sale” as the “selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or other means, a consumer’s personal information by [a] business to another business or a third party” in exchange for “monetary” or “other valuable consideration.”
So yes, they’re selling your data, and CA law is finally forcing them to admit it, rather than continuing to lie about it.