What about to Israel?
crickets as truckload after truckload of weapon drives by headed for a genocide
What about to Israel?
crickets as truckload after truckload of weapon drives by headed for a genocide
I need the rest of the world to realize the US has quietly COMPLETELY given up on mitigating climate change since AI. I mean WORSE than given up.
Centrists and liberals NEVER talk about it politically anymore, climate change is just accepted as a random form of punishment from God/The Rich.
The US is a rogue state.
Thank goodness for all the "both sides!" handwringing we did to get here.
Don't bother, play the free (free as in free, not "lootbox") moddable team based vehicle shooter Operation Harsh Doorstop or the WW2 team based vehicle shooter Easy Red 2.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/736590/Operation_Harsh_Doorstop/
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1324780/Easy_Red_2/
Both are indie games and are fantastic!
Here is some gameplay of OHD recorded on my Steam Deck, focused on flying helicopter support and demonstrating how perfect the Steam Deck is for flying (Note Easy Red 2 also has fighter planes as well as tanks and the planes are a dream to fly on the Steam Deck).
https://lostpod.space/w/qUyc9YLX69RK4xokm98qCW
https://lostpod.space/w/fYo9DBAxwWSace7X7X486t
https://lostpod.space/w/id9wMqsEmHSD9xQCTchQ9r
Edit Just jumped into Easy Red 2 again after having not played for two weeks or so and damn the performance just keeps getting better on the Steam Deck! Controls and general game feel are getting a lot more polished, it still feels like an indie game but it feels like a very polished one.
This is about wealth inequality too.
Can't have that, it makes the AI look bad!
In other words: J. Larry Jameson and the university is now actively taking part in the systemic harassment and invalidation of trans people.
Moreover, it has also sacrificed its academic reputation and independence by agreeing to follow the anti-trans “gender is biological sex” narrative, which no serious specialist in the field of gender and gender incongruence believes in.
Yes, but no... well drones confirm the trends identified here they don't subvert them. I would say this book anticipates why UAV/drones are so vital to integrate with and defend from for artillery in Ukraine, but while it discusses drones and loitering munitions it was written before the Ukraine invasion.
The bottom line with any new technology and artillery is the classic Upright Citizens Brigade improv mantra "yes and".
Ukraine from what I can gather has thoroughly answered that question.
Modern mechanized warfare against a near peer foe is a rock paper scissors game, armor is the rock, infantry paper, ok so drones are in some cases scissors/rocksaws... but artillery is the anvil you drop on the rock paper scissors game the same as it ever was.
The need for a large number of shells is primarily related to the number of enemy troops confronting our troops on a wide front. This is also due to the inability to fully utilize the aviation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which is due to the presence of a modern and multi-echeloned enemy air defence system and the outdated fleet of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
This is also due to the periodic impossibility of conducting precision fire due to the operation of enemy electronic warfare systems, which suppresses the operation of our command post.
Analysing the course of hostilities, we can say that it is possible to reduce the number of conventional shells by increasing the proportion of high-precision ammunition, as well as long-range firepower, such as tactical missiles, and increasing the effectiveness of other means of destruction. Also, the availability of high-precision weapons, kamikaze drones, and unmanned aerial vehicles that will be resistant to enemy electronic warfare may reduce the consumption of conventional ammunition.
The main factor that will affect the need for conventional ammunition will be the technological and numerical component of the means of destruction, which is objectively proportional to the number of enemy forces.
Also consider that autonomous vehicles supercharge "last mile" logistics of artillery resupply, you know what job no one should have? Driving a vehicle loaded with artillery shells through a plausibly dangerous area.
The Field Artillery (FA) has demonstrated itself as the primary casualty producing weapon of the last century, earning the moniker “King of Battle” during the World Wars. As the technology of conflict has advanced in the post-war era, the FA branch has evolved along with it, becoming more accurate and lethal. The focus of the last two decades has been on accuracy, precision and range; enhancing the effectiveness of fires while reducing the total amount of munitions needed to service targets. This growth in capability has come at a cost: the increased lethality of the system has forced adversaries to focus on targeting FA units, while the logistical trains necessary to “feed” the guns has only increased in step with increases in range of systems.
Integrating autonomous and semi-autonomous systems to reduce the manpower necessary to execute sustained operations is imperative for the future of the branch. Utilizing semi-autonomous vehicles to support casualty evacuation, ammunition and fuel resupply, reconnaissance and security will increase the survivability and lethality of artillery units while also reducing their manpower costs. Although seemingly divergent, these three Lines of Effort (LOEs) require a significant number of personnel to execute. Autonomous systems assisting in these operations would allow more personnel to focus on the execution of accurate and effective fires. Utilizing commercial off the shelf (COTs) products and retrofitting existing systems with readily available systems would be a fast, efficient way of reducing manpower requirements and increasing capability.
...
The promise that fewer, smarter munitions would be the way of the future has been negated by the realization that massed, effective fires are just as critical now as they were in the past and will be in the future. It is evident that the logistical requirements for ammunition alone are already staggering without considering the fuel, food and water needed for vehicles and personnel in the firing unit. To account for the natural attrition of the battlefield, notwithstanding potential mass casualty events to both personnel and equipment, it is imperative that the focus of the artillery be on reducing manpower requirements for anything other than the firing of artillery. As mentioned, the FA has several critical friction points that must be addressed soon.
I think the answer is both
I think Putin desperately needed it as Russia is starting to lose badly in Ukraine, not in terms of total available numbers of troops or ability to economically fight but just in terms of plain getting their ass kicked tactically and strategically in higher and higher percentages of engagements. Independent of the strategic situation, war is like tennis, no matter how far you are ahead in a game, you have to close the game out to win, which means winning points all the way to the end of the game. You can't just declare you have won because you have an obviously superior situation, and if the enemy knows every engagement you have with them costs you more than it costs them... well that quickly spirals into a massive problem no matter how far you are ahead because not even time will save you.
Whatever the reason, the big draw down in expensive anti-missile/drone stocks at least gives Russia a fighting chance (not that I am in favor of giving them a fighting chance here) but even still it doesn't matter as much any more if the US stops supporting Ukraine defense directly, it sucks but the effect seems to be Europe stepping up and investing in Ukraine and defense in general and I am not sure long term that is worse for Ukraine though short term it is obviously not good.
Particularly in the political realm of war, the new way to do a high profile military response that doesn't accomplish a military objective are drone attacks on cities that make big headlines but do little actual damage to the war machine of a country at level that matters enough to turn the tide of a war. This isn't to say the violence and destruction they cause isn't real, but rather it is aimed at almost more of a pyschological violence against a population of civilians rather than a material attack on a vulnerable part of the military industrial complex of Ukraine that facilitates it's ability to fight. If Ukraine has decisive missile defenses however and can embarassingly shoot down all of Russia's drones, that actually becomes a serious political threat to the legitimacy of their military in terms of the global world's assumed mantra that Russia must be overwhelmingly more powerful than Ukraine in sophistication and number because the saber rattling just looks weak.
I am not super confident in this, but it may be an indicator of how desperate Putin is getting, to push wildly for a drawn down of antimissile systems available to Ukraine so that Putin can manipulate a PR path to save face and lose the war in Ukraine while claiming to win because even as the logistics and infantry (armor? no more of that for Russia in any strategic number) mostly withdraw the world news can keep covering shocking massive drone attacks on Ukranian cities and retain an air of inveitability to Russia's dominance.
This isn't to say Russia isn't dangerous to Ukraine anymore, but rather to underscore that they are getting desperate.
Because of Netanyahu starting a war with Iran to stay in power.
If Canada can survive a couple more years there is going to be a booming disaster tourism industry of taking tours along Canada's southern border with the Zone tho.
The Next Generation Of Canadians?