sushibowl

joined 2 years ago
[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 29 points 1 day ago

There are open tournaments and women's tournaments. The open tournaments are for anyone. Women have competed in them but at the top level it is somewhat rare.

The women's tournaments are intended to provide an environment that encourages more women to play chess. There's considerable sexism among men (not only in the chess world, hah) which is not always very welcoming.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The basic problem is that identifiers can be either types or variables, and without a keyword letting you know what kind of statement you're dealing with, there's no way of knowing without a complete identifier table. For example, what does this mean:

foo * bar;

If foo is a type, that is a pointer declaration. But if it's a variable, that's a multiplication expression. Here's another simple one:

foo(bar);

Depending on how foo is defined, that could be a function call or a declaration of a variable bar of type foo, with some meaningless parentheses thrown in.

When you mix things together it gets even more crazy. Check this example from this article:

foo(*bar)();

Is bar a pointer to a function returning foo, or is foo a function that takes a bar and returns a function pointer?

let and fn keywords solve a lot of these ambiguity problems because they let the parser know what kind of statement it's looking at, so it can know whether identifiers in certain positions refer to types or variables. That makes parsing easier to write and helps give nicer error messages.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 6 points 3 weeks ago

Not so sure. Stuff like ITAR exists to prevent exactly that. The us could also declare SpaceX to be some kind of national security interest.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago

It will not, actually. This bill is far from budget neutral. The tax breaks for rich people are so massive that they far outweigh the big cuts to vital social programs. This bill will grow the deficit by trillions of dollars over the next decade.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago

Butter corn miso ramen is a thing in Sapporo. Probably invented to promote regional products (Hokkaido is famous for corn and dairy) to tourists.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 5 points 2 months ago

AC is not common in Europe. There's a variety of heating systems: gas boilers, direct electric heating, district heating, etc. Heat pumps are a growing market though.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, when you do find a text article explaining the thing it's often unnecessarily long and padded out with meaningless fluff, just so more advertising can be stuffed within the contents.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

Technically any Catholic male is eligible to become pope, it doesn't even have to be a cardinal. But yeah cardinals are the only ones voting so they always elect one of their own (with a few historical exceptions)

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Drones work now because they are $1000 (random number in the right range), while a patriot missile is $4 billion dollars each. Sure you could shoot a drone down with one, but if you do the enemy will just send more and bankrupt you.

I agree with the point but these numbers are some orders of magnitude off. A patriot missile is typically 4 million dollars (so not billion). Drones vary widely depending on the type. Man-portable scouting drones can go as low as a few hundred dollars. I don't think a patriot missile would ever target something that small flying that low though. The Iranian Shahed is estimated to cost around $30-50k. Russia produces its own upgraded version (better navigation systems, bigger warheads, etc.) that costs around $80k.

Even then, you can make 50 drones for the cost of a single patriot. The economics are not favourable.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've always heard it referred to as infringement, in a legal context. I'm sure game publishers (and music, film, etc.) would like to equate it in the public mind with common theft of physical goods, but it's all just propaganda.

We're just playing games with words at this point. The law is pretty clear, that distributing a copyrighted work such as a copy of a video game is illegal. I don't know why people like to repeat this line, that "if buying a game isn't owning then piracy isn't theft." Maybe it is a moral/ethical argument? It's not going to help you in court.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago

As a European, the idea of a bank having a drive-through is just absolutely wild.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago

Even if they moved the factory into the US, wouldn't they still need to import all the parts, and get hit by tariffs on those parts anyway? Like, the whole supply chain would have to move into the US. That could be a decade worth of effort.

view more: next ›