toadjones79

joined 3 months ago
[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

That's fair and only you know your situation. I'm just speaking from my experience as a dad, and what I have seen from other dads. You'd be surprised how often grown men and women get intimidated by elementary school teachers. Which is easier to avoid when you see them as a teammate with you instead of an authority figure. I frequently ask them how we can coordinate our efforts with my kids when they get it trouble. Not that that happens too often.

I have also noticed that my kids have more trouble certain years because of who the teacher is, and who they sit near. But my kids say that has nothing to do with anything and die on that hill. I'm not saying this in relation to what you said, again only you know. But it is always good to remember that our perspective of our childhood memories is developed by our childhood brains. It is impossible to know what we missed and how different our perspectives would be if we re-experienced them as adults.

But, sincerely, sorry your dad was a tool about your needs. That's sucks.

[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

I had the same experience. Starry nights were almost like stepping into a fantasy. I remember one friend came with me to get my glasses and he quoted his sister when she got first glasses and for some reason it stayed with me for the last thirty years.

I can actually see individual blades of grass.

[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

To be fair, your dad was probably just as scared of your teacher. Same with the principal.

If I hadn't had a dad who was a school counselor in my district used for all the worst problem kids I think I would have had a different experience. I wasn't a bad kid, but I was a weird one. As a result I got to see behind the curtain a little and think office politics plays a bigger part of why kids get in trouble than anything else (well, except actual parent involvement and how you raise your kids). Now that you mention this I think I'll take my youngest to get her eyes examined just to be safe.

[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

I have the unpopular opinion that dress codes are a good thing for a good reason. But the problem is that it gets enforced unfairly (like, by how sexually attracted or threatened adults get). Like your situation, the teacher basically said "Your ass is so 'distracting' in those tight pants I need you to stay right here alone with me after class for a while and keep on 'distracting' me."

But a clearly defined dress code meant to prepare youth for a future where they have to work on professional settings (notice that has nothing to do with "distractions") helps to keep the focus on becoming competent adults. Not on asses and boobs. Most people's future bosses don't give a crap about your self expression and just don't want to deal with complaints from coworkers or customers. I think I got this mindset when I was 14 and worked at a Dairy Queen with a seventy year old crack removed who often paraded around in yoga pants (before they were a thing) meant for 12 year olds and would say things like "I can't wait to go home and get naked." No one there wanted to think about her naked.

[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Ffs they didn't even have you try closer? That's like the first thing they are supposed to say if you can't see the chart.

[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Found the Wisconsinite.

Ok maybe not but we like to think so.

[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago

You should read the Murderbot Diaries. If you find this funny and unique, you will like Murderbot.

[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago

Well we also used to have no speed limit. Back in the Moderately Prudent days it was more common to get passed by a semi like you were standing still while going 100+ in a blizzard through a canyon. That was until nightfall, then the speed limit dropped to 55 on highways and 65 on the freeway. It was insane.

But it did result in a two speed system. Most of the highways are 75 during the day and 65 at night. Which to me just seems smarter.

Then again it has been over a decade since I was in Montana.

[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I tuck. I have found that it is the most reliable for keeping it from drying. Mostly j noticed this with bags of chips. Then I adapted that to bread.

[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 16 points 3 weeks ago

That's not true at all. Sometimes the cost is more for men. But almost universally the costs of the same item are more for women than for men. The running joke is that if you take the same volume of shaving cream, stick it in a taller narrower bottle, and add a label with purple and butterflies; you can slap a higher price on it.

Look at pockets. Women rarely find clothes with pockets. When they do the pockets are usually very inadequate. Their pants use less material but cost more.

Alternatively, their clothes often take more materials to clean, so drycleaners cost more for women's clothing. Haircuts cost more for women but they usually take more time and materials as well. So there are often hidden considerations that complicate how we judge and view this matter. At the end of the day it costs more if manufacturers can get away with charging more without losing sales.

[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 36 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I am down 50+ pounds, and have another 20 to go. This is new to me, but I absolutely agree with everything you said.

[–] toadjones79@lemm.ee 6 points 4 weeks ago

I can't believe it took me 45 years to try that but man am I happy I did. Well, I'm almost there. None of my clothes fit anymore though.

 

Got suspended for agreeing that plotting to assassinate the president is "the lesser of two evils" compared with murdering one's own parents.

view more: next ›