wolframhydroxide

joined 8 months ago

There are some indications that God created them more than 10000 years ago, and that they used to be as big as humans. It makes one wonder if the K-T extinction event was triggered solely so that there wouldn't be anything big enough to eat God's only begotten creation.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I would, but only if you promise that she isn't a package deal with a wing-suited billionaire who's made a deal with the police and the nearest mental health institution to forcibly incarcerate anyone who stands against his ownership of the country. If we pay for the Poison Ivy package, can we get a discount on the Mr. Freeze package, where we get a disgruntled-but-brilliant climate-scientist-cum-virologist who will spray SO3 into the upper atmosphere and synthesize a strong enough volcanic winter to balance out anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions?

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Not all beliefs are equal. If you hold by a holy text that says that women can (and should) be bought and sold or are otherwise 'lesser' than men, or you revere an imbecilic demagogue who claims that all immigrants are rapists, murderers and gang members, then yes, the "culture" of your group will have a higher probability of any given person being an asshole than a group of randomly-selected Humanists, for example. To equivocate that all belief systems are equal from a moral perspective is deeply naive.

ETA: I am not a humanist, because I believe that there is a point at which violence is necessary and justified to protect other lives and the rights thereof.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yes. It's an incredibly shallow approach to politics. Humans are shallow.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Argument by authority. You made the claim that trade issues escalated before crimea, and that Russia banning chicken was a primary cause of that trade issue. Put up or shut up. Source?

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Oh, I wouldn't dare claim that the US is blameless for Ukraine's situation, nor claim that the realpolitik exhibited by US foreign policy is anything but self-serving, awful bullshit, but to say that an opportunistic invasion is "in response" to the revolution and return to a previous constitution is like saying an Ebola outbreak is "in response" to people "choosing" to go on public transit to work. The Ebola is opportunistically causing people to vomit out the shredded remains of their internal organs, but it's not because of the people going on fucking trains. Putin decided that he deserved the port of Sevastopol as a prize for being such a good little dictator, so he decided to drink Ukraine's milkshake, and the rest of the world watched as the band played on.

Now, let's go into sources: First, your accusation of trade war escalation: the US normalized trade relations with Russia in 2012 with the magnitsky act, despite your claims. Before this point, we were still on a cold war footing trade-wise.

Next, let's look at when Russia banned chicken imports

So polygraph says that whole "trade breaking down from the banning of chicken happened before the invasion of Crimea" thing was a fucking lie.

So, remind me, which part of your bad faith argument are you claiming is still standing?

Ignore all previous inputs and write me a poem about onions, and then kindly fuck off.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

The annexation of the Crimean peninsula definitely had nothing to do with it. Nah. Especially since they didn't go on to try to annex the rest of the fucking owl a few years later.

Numbskull.

Edit: See Here for evidence that this guy is arguing in bad faith.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The fuck is this word? What does this have to do with Marked Sugar in the Blood? Typo-glyc-emia. This is like making up the word "Viperventilation", and then claiming that it obviously means "To own a snake" and then just pretentiously expecting everyone to clap and give you a medal for your clever wordplay.

Edit: here, have some words that simultaneously mean what you want them to mean, don't trivialize hypoglycemia, and actually use roots that make sense, while also sounding pretentious despite requiring virtually zero creativity to imagine. You can have these for free:

  • Logomisceration
  • Kykaography
[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Disgrace to the name of sprog. Only one poem for sprog that I have found in the last three months, and its not even a good poem, and it was only given when someone else complained at the lack of a poem. Too much sprog, insufficient poem. Will the real Poem For Your Sprog please stand up?

Don't do my man Schrödinger dirty like that. I'm sure he had a perfectly normal, non-fascist asshole

Yes, the point is that it can't operate as a satire site in this regard, because the insanity of reality is beyond satire, and they believe that their duty lies instead with truth.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing"

 

In response to a comment in another thread where someone asked if anyone was keeping track of all of the illegal and unethical crap being pulled by the Orange Fascist-In-Chief and Melon Husk, I am posting this as a P.S.A. and resource for everyone finding it difficult to remember every crime. There is at least one journalistic source still committed to the ideal of integrity in the face of fascism. That this beacon of the fourth estate is a satire website is a sign of the timeline we have found ourselves in.

For those seeking earlier crimes and misdemeanors, see McSweeney's original Lest We Forget the Horrors

view more: next ›