yetAnotherUser

Can't read the article (paywall) but how are Lidl's cloud services more significant than something like OEDIV owned by food manufacturer Dr. Oetker?

Same with 8 GB of L1 cache.

I use Denmark English for sane date formatting.

Though I don't know why that locale exists.

ssself

Weichen dann nicht einige der Betrunkenen auf Autos aus? Das könnte ganz schön nach hinten losgehen, die Roller nachts zu verbieten.

To be fair, train drivers slamming on the brakes can be good if the train is behind schedule. It allows them to catch up by like half a minute per stop which adds up.

Sure, I agree with nearly everything you said.

Except that on a German instance you must abide German laws. If it were a Belgian instance, Belgian laws would have to be followed. You can call anyone and anything a nazi outside of instances hosted by Germans.

For similar reasons, calls for the death of billionaires are removed on lemmy.world because that violates laws where that instance is hosted.

The Radbruch formula is not bullshit though, as it explicitly defines when disobedience of laws is mandatory. Slightly infringing on freedom of speech is not a valid reason, as it doesn't violate fundamental rights that cannot ever be restricted by laws - most notably the freedom to live and being free of bodily harm.

There is no issue with rewarding work with luxury while still providing everyone with the necessities to survive - such as a basic home and food.

Besides, you can reduce unemployment by just reducing working hours. 40 hours per week is way too much frankly. Why not 30 or even 20? That way everyone has more free time which results in better health and more productivity.

If following a law slightly restricting freedom of speech - which is fully compatible with the German constitution may I add - ensures the existence of the instance, then yes, following this law is a moral good.

Besides, wrong laws should be followed, provided the law is not unjust in its very foundation (such as a law mandating the dealth penalty). That's the Radbruch formula which is a core of German jurisprudence since WW2 which allows for prosecution of "legal" crimes and mandates disobedience of unjust laws.

This current law - or rather the interpretation of it - is objectively wrong. Its foundation - the criminalization of antisemitism and Holocaust denial - however is not unjust in its very being.

You can be assured feddit.org will never follow any "law, no matter how wrong it is" - as that would be illegal.

Zero parts of that comment violate German law or would get the comment removed from !europe@feddit.org

The comment doesn't doesn't draw a parallel to nazis nor does it call for an end to Israel, therefore it is completely fine both by German law and the moderator's actions.

If one genocide is lesser in scale or severity it can be (and has been) argued it is downplaying it.

There are very few genocides you can directly compare to the Holocaust as its scale and speed was unprecedented even for the time.

I'm unsure you can compare any other genocide to the Holocaust in accordance with German law.