you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 87 points 5 days ago (13 children)

I've seen a number of news articles disproving this recent viral claim - saying the "bots" traffic lost was just the equivalent of Russia's Google's crawlers. Honestly though, beyond occasional use of Lemmy, I don't use any social media so I have no experience as to things feeling different.

Is it actually quieter out there or is it just wishful thinking?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    I wouldn't be surprised if there was an initial down spike but realistically they'd just spin up the bots somewhere else basically immediately.

    Like a lot of what a data center does is act as a glorified router. You'd need to take out a server that just so happened to host some bot code that somehow isn't stored anywhere else for the effects to be permanent...

    Or other countries actually stop taking Russian money. One of the two.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 days ago* (3 children)

    I'd imagine most bots originate from compromised Pcs and other IoT devices and the servers are just coordinators.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    My understanding is in those cases the troll farms are routing traffic through the devices, not running bots on the device itself, but I guess I wouldn't be particularly surprised if that could work too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    So, the data center attacks could slow or stop the flow of traffic, regardless of how many devices are compromised?

    Regardless, Russian data centers are viable targets for Ukraine. Behind military and oil infrastructure, of course, but still viable targets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 5 days ago

    There is a real tangible drop. But it's also limited in scope.

    So where the bots focused yeah it was night and day different. But over all? Really kind of a drop in the bucket.

    So personal experience just varies wildly based on where online you hang out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

    Those articles don't debunk shit, they just explain that the data on the charts is web crawlers. Nobody but platform owners can effectively estimate the amount of bot traffic they have - and even if they can distinguish today, cause with AIs it's really complicated.

    So we just don't have the stats, but it doesn't mean people can't use personal perception. And yes, xitter is a lot cleaner now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 days ago

    What the article really does is challenge the notion that bot behavior on social media is down as there is a significant lack of evidence. The burden of proof lies with the one who makes the claim, in this case, a European Parliament MP and the Ukrainian government (namely: Zelensky who repeated the claim).

    As there is no evidence yet, and the only 'evidence' being touted so far does not in fact show what they say it does, the notion is falsified until further evidence is provided.

    I'm sure people are happy to think social media has been 'cleaned up' a lot more, but I have yet to see any verified and reliable evidence that isn't just 'well I feel like'.

  • source
  • parent