Wilding v. DNC is the court case where the DNC admitted that they don't have to abide by the primaries because they are a private entity and can nominate whomever they want.

They admitted this in open court because so many people voted in the primaries for Bernie, and yet they nominated Hillary, that they could no longer hide this fact from the majority of the Democrat voting public.

The truth was short lived though, as that case is almost completely memory holed, and everyone pretends like none of that happened a decade ago.

I was there. I remember. Sure, vote in the primaries and vote for the "lesser evil", but we won't win anything without infiltrating the Democrat bureaucracy and forming unions and serious protests.

The primaries that they can decide not to have? Or that the winner didn't really win?

I'm gonna need to stop you right there.

Pushing for better candidates means defining a coherent set of qualities one wants in a candidate and then actually doing legwork for them instead of flinging shit everywhere from the lazy safety of your bedroom in your parents' house.

True, but do democrats improve more than the previous republican made it worse? It doesn't feel like it.

Also I wouldn't use Healthcare as an example of something that works in the US

Also thousands of innocent civilians were murdered on the other side of the planet by those democrats, but they were brown so they didn't count?