I was originally going to ask how many legal genders there should be, but I fail to see a compelling argument against 0.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 10 hours ago* (3 children)

This assumes that men and women have the same medical needs. They don't. Our average hormonal balances are completely different so for a doctor to be able asses doses, they need to know what the average hormonal balance is for women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    but what they really need to know is the average hormonal balance for that specific person, before they started going out of whack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

    Except women's hormonal balances change during different phases of each month, but not for men. Thus the need to study women's health since women and men have different phisiologies. Oh look, we've come full circle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 hours ago

    I mean, yes, we need to study women's health more. It's a big glaring hole in a ton of medical research. I'm just trying to stay with the vibe of the thread. I think that just like with cutting edge cancer research being done that focuses on tailoring the specific drug/method of action to that persons specific cancer, so too should most of our medical treatments be tailored not just to what's between your legs, but to you, specifically. More research into everyone, but especially the largely ignored demographic of women, is needed to accomplish this. So... you're right, but I think I'm right too.

  • source
  • parent