I was originally going to ask how many legal genders there should be, but I fail to see a compelling argument against 0.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 3 days ago*

Traditionally, for inheritance & land tax purposes, the woman takes the owner's name; her attributes, kids & possessions are settled or accounted for upon her husband/father's death. Most of these laws were written in maritime law, where men were expected to die in battle or get lost at sea... So who gets a man's valuables is mostly why there are only 2 genders by law, and always have been... The only reason 70 + pronouns were floated as a concept came from Marxist communist pseudo-philosophy, zionists in the White House trying to subvert the education sector and universities to push transgendeisum. That's why all the Ivy League academic institutions have liberal democrats running them now, producing idiots who say "men can get pregnant". American education sector is being bought out, gutted and turned into political brainwashing camps for people who will believe anything.

  • source