you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 181 points 4 days ago (35 children)

An entire industry built around burning cash, water, and electricity to generate questionable answers based on glorified autocorrect. It’s astounding.

Throw another few trillion and a couple dozen rain forests at it. Completely rational behavior.

  • source
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 4 days ago (8 children)

    glorified autocorrect and plagiarism/nonatribition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    Have you actually used it recently? It’s become incredibly good. Calling it a glorified autocorrect is like calling ASML’s lithography machines a glorified polaroid camera.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    Now now this is the frediverse. Your only allowed to ignore facts and hate on ai around here.

    There's plenty of good reasons to hate AI but in case you missed the notice on the door your not allowed to have nuance. It's all or nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago* (4 children)

    lol... it's hardly limited to the fediverse bud, people are learning why the economy is fucked: AI

    why can't they buy a console? AI.

    OR A GPU.

    OR AN SSD.

    OR RAM.

    OR A FUCKING SPINNING DISK HDD.

    why does the food in the adverts look like nightmare fuel? AI.

    why does the president think he's popular? AI.

    Tim Sweeney castigates Kenny - why? AI.

    Musk can't synthesize a personality so he snorts ketamine and AI.

    where's the upside, ASSHOLES? Your garbage is fucking up the entire planet, great fuckin work FANBOYS, shove that up your ass for NUANCE

    In 20 years - if there's still a civilization - they're all gonna look back and wonder how so many were so fuckin dumb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    In 20 years we ALWAYS look back and wonder how so many were so fucking dumb. Thats literally history. Theres never a point where there isn't some major fucking bunch of absolute idiots trying to ruin everything.

    Ai is just this decades attempt at ruining everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

    ok, so it's like asbestos and nuclear waste runoff, that's not enough reason to hate AI for you?

    instead of stopping the stupidity you're like: find the nuance.

    sexhaver87@sh.itjust.works - lol doubt sheetzoos@lemmy.world -

    listen kids, if you're not brave enough to let chatgpt give you a riposte don't fucking participate ya little shits

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    That's entirely enough reason to hate it.

    But it's also objectively fucking stupid to act as if this is some new historic event in human history and not just yet another dumb fuck move in a long line of dumb fuck moves.

    Plenty of good reasons to be pissed off. You don't have to lie and bullshit to make up more is what I'm getting at.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago*

    oh because of all the other times someone hoovered up the total store of human knowledge?

    get over yourself, jeeze.

    no lies, this is something new, no bullshit made up, no one's fucked humanity quite this way before. stop being such an emo doomer seen-it-all because you haven't, this is new.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 4 days ago (20 children)
  • [+] -42 points 4 days ago (16 children)

    You act as though those billions of dollars spent towards other things (like cancer research) would somehow be better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 4 days ago (10 children)

    ?

    Fucking yes it would be better to put hundreds of billions of dollars every year into curing cancer/HIV/ Type 1 diabetes/alzheimers, literally any disease. Curing a major illness like those would actively help hundreds of thousands or millions of people around the world every year.

    What does AI help? My fucking manager in sending cryptic emails that raise more questions than answers?

    Dump a few hundred billion into disease research, or fusion power, or just into housing for all of us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -22 points 3 days ago (9 children)

    AI helped me with my voting ballot. I asked Kagi's AI to research the ambiguous candidates and propositions. I had it put them into a political alignment chart - left/centrist/rightwing. Addendums for candidates included things like whether they had criminal convictions or corruption, stance on vaccinations, how they feel about "tough on crime", the homeless, ect.

    For propositions, the political alignments had a fourth entry added, where the yes/no included the wealth level of backers for a position.

    This is very useful, completing in a hour what would have taken a week of research. Very useful for digging into the mechanical details of a proposition, like whether it prevented the replacement or supplementing of a measure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

    That’s a lot of words just to say you’re an idiot that would rather offload important critical thinking skills to a piece of software that a rational person wouldn’t trust to provide a cookie recipe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    Better to be an idiot, than to be an jackass. I wouldn't trust you to be a good person.

    Also, the cornbread recipe the AI gave me an hour ago is pretty damn good. Perfectly adjusted to my ingredient list, tools, and pan size, and specifics like whether I want the food to be moist or dry.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    How do you know that anything it displayed was accurate for those candidates? Every single time I've asked it to include source links, those source links don't actually support the AI's statement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    One of the candidates was appointed to their office by a Republican governor, and elevated more recently by a Democratic one. The AI referred to official government records.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Well, that's one candidate. And a reference to an official gov doc doesn't meant the info was extracted or summarized accurately.

    How about the others?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    Remember to never miss the /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    But have you considered that it's like REALLY good at programming? /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    What's stupid is, you could even just keep just the programming part, and it would become much more efficient and not ramble on with explanations etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

    If an LLM was something you could train on your GitHub repo or an internal knowledge base, and ask it natural language questions about that, AND it didn't need an 800 acre datacenter to do it, I wouldn't have so many hang-ups about it. Or maybe even train a model in a programming language and have a model that's tailor made for writing C, or LISP, or Brainfuck or something.

    But that's not what they are. They only function if you hoover up everything the light touches and feed it to the machine, to the point where rare, irreplaceable literature is being shredded apart for training data. And god help you if you try to take your ball and go play somewhere else as the AI boosters profess you must do, they will follow you there and scrape you anyway

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments