46
Linux Distribution Chooser Tool (unknownuniverse.uk)
submitted 5 days ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 5 days ago* (10 children)

Would be funny if somebody forked it but with all results ending up in Arch linux.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago (8 children)

    All roads eventually end up at Arch. And then some people get lost in the misty Nix Forest. Some never find their way out.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 5 days ago (6 children)

    Nah, some of us land on Gentoo from the beginning, and then watch the Arch people act like teens who think they're edgy. 😜

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (5 children)

    Arch users think they're... "edgy"? Honestly, if I had the patience to wait for compilation when upgrading, I'd run Gentoo as well. Arch for me was the next best thing in terms of making the system "my own". I mostly feel in love with the packaging system of Arch and how easy it was to make my own packages. Great stuff.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (4 children)

    Gentoo provides binary packages if you don't want to compile.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    That's cool. What does Gentoo do better than Arch in your opinion? Any category! 🙂

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (2 children)

    I haven't used Arch in a long time, but from what I remember...

    Arch and Gentoo are both rolling releases, but Gentoo is rolling stable while Arch is bleeding edge.

    If you game, you can't beat being able to drop kernel patches in a folder and have them applied on every update. Works for all packages, not just the kernel.

    GURU has a bit more oversight than the AUR, but not as many packages.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    I'm thinking Arch is definitely for me, then:

    • I prefer bleeding edge. No delay, things haven't broken my system in a decade, seems like it's fine for personal use anyway.
    • I don't need any kernel patches as a heavy gamer, my system can run whatever you throw at it.
    • The AUR seems to have a far simpler and less convoluted process for contributing than GURU.

    Still, I'm curious: what kernel patches do you feel the need to apply, as a gamer?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago

    You can enable the bleeding edge too, if you like. The repos have multiple versions of packages.

    I need the bigsceen beyond patches for better VR support.

    I've never contributed to the AUR, so I can't really compare. GURU does have a bit of process in exchange for some oversight, but there are completely unmoderated overlays too.

    That's completely fair! I think pacman is a much nicer to use package manager than emerge, and Arch has a great community :3

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent