There's also a practical element, where Steam is not in a position to vet every game and developer. They could have the community do it, but that then opens up a whole bunch of abuse risks.

There's also an argument that it wouldn't stop some of the issues in the article. Where do you draw the line with asset flip, or AI generated? If the developer used AI to make placeholders in the early access of a game, and then swapped it with removed it later on, is the game still AI generated? What if they used assets that were unknowingly AI generated, like stock sound effects?

Or if someone is ESL and used a translator that turned out to be AI powered/they just write with a similar style.

It also won't stop people doing it.maliciously. if you're threatening to clone someone's game off a demo, and release it before they do, you're probably not going to stop because you need to put a little "AI generated" flag on your game, if the rest of it didn't stop you.