this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
270 points (97.2% liked)

Selfhosted

46688 readers
703 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 108 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.


Richard P. Feynman

I think the same is true for a lot of folks and self hosting. Sure, having data in our own hands is great, and yes avoiding vendor lock-in is nice. But at the end of the day, it's nice to have computers seem "fun" again.

At least, that's my perspective.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Personally I don't enjoy setting things up. I do enjoy not being tied down to evil corporations.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

99% of people want computers to serve them, not to be fun. My SO couldn't care less how much fun I have setting up home assistant. They just want to turn on the lights.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but did your SO set up home assistant?

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

No. They just want to buy an Apple home thingy 🥹

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

Yeah that kinda enforces their point.

[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 11 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Well, yes, most people want computers to be unnoticable and boring. I agree, we need more boring tech that just does a job and doesn't bother us. That said, plenty of people find self-hosting to be fun - your SO and mine excepted, of course.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

most people want computers to be unnoticable and boring. I agree, we need more boring tech

professional UI designers don't seem to agree. they always feel the urge to come up with the next worst design

[–] aksdb@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

For me it's not even about better or worse, but about different. For them it's a nice iteration after many years, but for be it is one of the dozens of apps I use irregularly that suddenly behaves and works different and forces me to relearn things I don't have any gain from. Since each of the different apps get that treatment every once in a while, I end up having to adjust all the damn time for something else.

I would really like we could go back to functional applications being sold as is without forced updates. I do not need constant changes all the time. WinAmp hasn't changed in 20 years and still does exactly what it is supposed to. I could probably spin up an old MS Word 2000 and it would work just like it did 20 years ago.

Many modern apps however change constantly. No wonder they all lean towards subscriptions if they "have to" work on it all the time. But I, as a user, don't even want that. I want to buy the thing that does what it's supposed to and then I want it to stay that way.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 19 hours ago

My SO watches free tier youtube.