299
We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. Here’s the story you haven’t heard. (www.technologyreview.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
156 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast ... as it gets better, we'll become too dependent.

"all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,,,"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

Lul yes but no, but they are clearly better at many types of tasks.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    For example? Citations?

    Pretty sure these "tasks" are meaningless metrics made up by pseudo-scientific grifters.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Small bits of code, language related tasks, basic context understanding, not metrics I have literally measured simply noticed has improved compared to non reasoning models in my homelab testing. 🤷‍♂️

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent