• President Donald Trump on Friday said he is “recommending a straight 50% Tariff on the European Union” after complaining that trade negotiations have stalled.

  • The EU “has been very difficult to deal with,” Trump wrote. “Our discussions with them are going nowhere!”

The European Union, which was formed for the primary purpose of taking advantage of the United States on TRADE, has been very difficult to deal with. Their powerful Trade Barriers, Vat Taxes, ridiculous Corporate Penalties, Non-Monetary Trade Barriers, Monetary Manipulations, unfair and unjustified lawsuits against Americans Companies, and more, have led to a Trade Deficit with the U.S. of more than $250,000,000 a year, a number which is totally unacceptable. Our discussions with them are going nowhere! Therefore, I am recommending a straight 50% Tariff on the European Union, starting on June 1, 2025. There is no Tariff if the product is built or manufactured in the United States. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 1 year ago (9 children)

The fact that we the EU are still trying to negotiate with the US is pathetic. We should not be entertaining this clique.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Allies on paper, EU can't simply tell tramp to go fuck himself like China can, for now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Good point but why do they get to tell us to go fuck ourselves then? We are also their allies on paper.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Well, the alliance was not symmetric to start with, the US used to call the shots and the EU would follow if it wasn't a stupid decision or sit on its hands otherwise. russia's invasion and the US's passivity is challenging that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    russia's invasion and the US's passivity is challenging that.

    Passivity? As in the US should do more than use Ukraine as a proxy, but should get involved in a war with Russia to defend Ukraine?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    All I'm saying is that Ukraine finally made strikingly clear that in the current configuration Europe is the junior partner in NATO and that Europe needs to have its own means in the future to defend its own interests (during the cold war, those interests were always aligned, so it was never a problem). But once that happens, Europe won't remain the junior partner anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    As a lemm.ee user, you should be perfectly aware that if Ukraine is anyone's proxy, then of Estonia: Ukraine is following Estonian doctrine on how to deal with Russia to a t.

  • source
  • parent