this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
54 points (78.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33250 readers
1512 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(As a general concept of how a society should run, not intended as a US-specific question.)

I sometimes see people on the internet saying that giving people easy access to guns is too risky and there should be stricter gun control, while simultaneously wanting to abolish the police? I'm just confused on what people really want?

You cant both abolish the police and then also disarm the citizens, gotta pick one. So which is it, internet? Self-policing with guns? Or reform the police?

[Please state what country you're in]

::: spoiler


(Also its funny how the far-right of the US is both pro-gun and pro-police, I'm confused by that as well) :::

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I think we should get rid of guns entirely and go back to hand-to-hand combat with swords and clubs. Guns make it too easy. I want a challenge.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

back to hand-to-hand combat with swords and clubs.

How very nice!

I'm going to invent black powder then, so I become the boss!

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hand to hand combat is very unequal. If you get lucky, you have the genes that naturally make you stronger.

Guns equalize the playing field.

Also, you can't hand-to-hand a bear. Humans aren't the only threat that exists.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s a very small percentage of people who would come across a bear and need a weapon. Here in eastern us, you shouldn’t have them for black bears. However I can see long guns in places with grizzlies ….. im not convinced it useful, but I can understand feeling threatened

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

First time I bought a firearm in my life (after 40 years on this earth) was specifically protection from bears when I moved to Alaska.

I get that I'm part of that very small percentage, but it's funny to be pointed out for it when where I am it is super common (also common to see people strapped on hiking trails with their kids and dogs).

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also, you can't hand-to-hand a bear.

Polearms > Bear arms

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)