this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
84 points (89.6% liked)

movies

1242 readers
279 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

We asked The Atlantic’s writers and editors: What’s a film adaptation that’s better than the book?

The article explains why they consider the movies Jurassic Park, The Talented Mr. Ripley, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, The Devil Wears Prada, The Social Network, and Clear and Present Danger each to be better than their source material.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Starship Troopers

But mostly because it isn't really based on the book at all. Paul Verhoeven famously tried to read the book, got immediately bored and decided to make it his own thing.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Isn't the book super pro-fascism?

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Yes, Knowing Better has done a great analysis on such

17:52 for the book

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

I recall an authoritarian college professor in the book. When considered alongside Heinlein's other work, I suspect the text of the professor's lectures are meant to be examined critically.

Of course, Poe's Law says that someone will take any satire at face value. Or that I took as satire something not meant to be?

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

That depends a lot on who you ask. All the weird propaganda in the movie is not there, but also the way that the main character explains how his society functions is perhaps incomplete.

We don't see their society being racist (except against aliens) or sexist, we don't see them suppress free speech or labor rights, we don't see them worshipping some kind of Fuhrer either.

Personally, I think that war makes fascists of us all and that's what the book tried to convey.

[–] mudstickmcgee@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The book certainly has its moments, but the movie is much more entertaining. 'The moon is a harsh mistress' is a better book imo

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Both were entertaining, but the movie was more of a popcorn action flick while the book tried to explore the realities of war and a warrior led culture.

The Heinlein estate holders didn't like the movie so much, they have refused selling movie rights to any other book. So you won't see The Moon is a Harsh Mistress because of Starship Troopers.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Movie was some deep cutting satire.

[–] Master@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Book is emensely better. I read it every other year or so. Fucking great book. An okish movie.

If the movie had power armor it would have been no contest but as it is it's just a monument to Verhoeven being too lazy to read a two hundred page book because there weren't enough Jesus metaphors for his taste.